IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Forget CLAT

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 21 September 2017 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90938134835 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 03:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tEXfyAb8KT_L for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 03:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09FD0134838 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 03:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u205so3725863ywa.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 03:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WN3TelueaKoRbuQB2Z87DKbtkjmq5h+iK0Bu7HBQ+Yg=; b=v1vDUhwu8H0YCrQXMpIkV+aldEPs2aQRAsYNRMVGbMewgHoWS3QQ97FrPGJ68MN/pr ryyzej50aewI+yKdZBDk1dNq9KhzdKDcF5eemeQbh/PBthkCvT6X7ATHVElq2rEIvr5C FmEOWs+OeqoAZUERI95GPaT8/aPCOmLREPVdm1Hc6GsV0qutwYGfL+d5QcgRi80V+9d7 IKM7lydP/fVQe0mQjJrdUeQaGU8T3EMgIB2isOq7GVyGiPpnfG3kdY7p4+dE7eA1vqEk T/d45lA1VUj3gP7HvJ9Akazejw54fWdvXiyyTq82LEbFkBnFjDh+eD2VUBWj0h6qjIry czVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WN3TelueaKoRbuQB2Z87DKbtkjmq5h+iK0Bu7HBQ+Yg=; b=j0HJhlz0FgNwI5Ni1hezUzkOILEq7Xhqqw2ASyADxP6KEipgYv2jeNHb1CngKwP0by WBi2OMOiRK7coaME0L6dCHlbVAJ6vZsID9zJqPOi9ucKLTO8pMDntXmCjedTTZG1suuf AxkFapXtQNRkfW8lN4XCPrLDAHNJex7HaKI3PmVohNwngg8fdWnUY48LNW+2WPOIQokQ hm9OTjkBnl58qyax2ggg4IqPNSevMYu23AX2vYT6EikWbq8WXzyU7kIHJsbOOKQVcmwX nuj6jkgDmW1BSuUUhn6HM3SewJM6MJizHLsTo/wluMbQDqa58Il6sJhhXOEzEqJoLxwx bSrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgOEpaVKxIWoulYqnMpcRAQcUdV97HojIal4XjhWgn1sAZTLqcr sGM2LbstiCjddUW4Ava7TROhfqI2cm7o0/NNume92Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDLIBkuft9wSImovvRaNtQ5tr6s57h8c4nv4F1f/IUkNgWF+Idi9W5IMPwWJfM4+hRCX3xVknCbcWDS93Ik/Pg=
X-Received: by 10.37.16.193 with SMTP id 184mr1286077ybq.178.1505989223798; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 03:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.214.213 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 03:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <888e6f9c-3351-2e50-a12e-bf5280d81294@gmail.com>
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es> <a4385de4-ba3e-0b36-1bfd-ef3210fba08c@gmail.com> <6BD0B640-8853-4B32-9B30-936D8F58000F@consulintel.es> <8503DEC8-026D-4AA2-A887-87B29A2B2611@apple.com> <CAKD1Yr1Dh_qPVbKYXU9e9N2EqeKgS9yQYDR9aao9R-zGa3cU=g@mail.gmail.com> <376bfd13-8f22-3255-0f3b-d077cc205cc9@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1V5BsrrEO68ASS1hF-Qj3Q_SsyquXeRx0gNRdNURcKsw@mail.gmail.com> <888e6f9c-3351-2e50-a12e-bf5280d81294@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 19:20:03 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1A+50XaeGbHwyd5vewNTAW3UzfF57gvEAdsmzUK3SOoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113eddbab8ef2b0559b07082"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4taSl-GCGi_Wvvj9uSKcXvfwq0M>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Forget CLAT
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:20:36 -0000

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's no need for any extra addresses.
>>
>
> I think we should stop here.
>
> Forget CLAT.
>

No, sorry. We shouldn't forget something that tens of millions of Internet
users use every day.

To be clear: I don't think we need to do anything about 464xlat. We have an
RFC. We have implementations. They work. Nothing special to be done here.
But we should not forget about the technologies that real world networks
are built on. If we do that, the IETF will rapidly become irrelevant.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email