IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info - double stack coexistence

Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz> Mon, 25 September 2017 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@helix.net.nz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52435133341 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id akkpbxzO9FE1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 878D6132EC4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x54so6226865qth.12 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=48W0d951Hm34+k+HXs+0bcouTumVNtkTJ4m6XlAX+5w=; b=cnFI4QNpW29Q8pHMs1HJEJ+BoCkEOf9mhRZJQbYZssC3I+R7v4o2BxXF6+yqddYYSM HtSOCQwfVSIB/WU490SwYtyTHZmGA1JvgdXTUOYovC/yJuSPXnC6qfnNDYJaNSJTCwlM sUBWGucrdZBaK5lMa9MVYJMetsEOA3QcaDcX3ZQIb5H1ykO/iHeg/jCsN+SXZ1+8juEr tvknUOeLjZU8rqNpFbzeui0+S0rGM04YEQPSp45Fcw+/cvJdrBQVN/HFENtHPxLK3wWj M0csPTsZuGd+mx/e1pHJCKC98/ZdVc2x1WjfCGdCfTiCH1+PSoB5LFFP4zQ1g6XGzn9O C55Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=48W0d951Hm34+k+HXs+0bcouTumVNtkTJ4m6XlAX+5w=; b=IrRtAIAPpN01kWsLER4rY1jLGEaChI1yDbDuFKtLGEZXyDsetANCSWI4AcMy0vv975 3oXjLTIgOYQhAMQItcdNXKZWetmn+Zy+qcbdM0g+Jpt632plTa/MbWw52rK7UXAxslLF YApa3bE/TR3q342otkNvR07sKxC/ob6/VbGpetelbPxm2i35RK2iM9PDz54KipL7RnaL D9b4I271yKkTXdvx1qVqgKuVqvpKct+py/79p1dBEIOdKkm2NbhpOXGm3Z18nV2pvyjX bHZKU2o+EXZvyjjcPY18cszSPTyuidlIpbkMGv7bbh09niXOOd+bXuxN/ZovbQAW3ARD w1Jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjfdesOE8QeVFUmCLRrMne6GOFgJEbcN3PH8KmBL3GYrb5cUAOO O7rx1ephac4q7zQ0J2HdFncdSoJT
X-Received: by 10.237.62.176 with SMTP id n45mr9676152qtf.302.1506333389531; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com (mail-qk0-f169.google.com. [209.85.220.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p77sm4508098qkp.44.2017.09.25.02.56.28 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id s132so6074315qke.7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCHoHygewTIe+OD+kKt9uFQwbfGDBE6feguoWOnQoNwTapIo9IQvU4sBBW+WVfFTfr9SFD7LYLIDyrGB+WlxAQ=
X-Received: by 10.55.159.80 with SMTP id i77mr9764924qke.76.1506333388729; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.101.183 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <30eddc4a-c2cc-0e6a-9a39-7db255705b16@gmail.com>
References: <D5E8043B.86B21%lee@asgard.org> <E48DDA04-C058-4992-906E-8C8BC0E102AB@consulintel.es> <1BFA3605-4B16-4331-A7BA-3BDECBCA64EC@gmail.com> <85868796-18C7-48F4-BE69-8D50A1F47EF3@jisc.ac.uk> <472CC0F7-73C2-4A21-8F96-BBC966B01B77@employees.org> <de6b9aac-a3cc-0915-77c7-9fb880c3a16a@gmail.com> <20170921223305.B72A8878E716@rock.dv.isc.org> <122454EE-64C5-4768-A6A9-1AD0E872F5F9@employees.org> <2a879713-bfd0-2ba0-cb67-53726f6e1faf@gmail.com> <41c808ef-b2c0-6e74-e61d-e89fcebe5e0a@gmail.com> <FA8911A1-CE3E-40E2-A11F-12303A3B4D1C@asgard.org> <e38bb7d2-1376-e790-8c20-19d54ec6b163@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709251025270.18564@uplift.swm.pp.se> <30eddc4a-c2cc-0e6a-9a39-7db255705b16@gmail.com>
From: Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:56:08 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAHL_VyAVXdom+n0sTKHDiF+NzwQoTP-r66QZeMPukDJBN0EKqw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHL_VyAVXdom+n0sTKHDiF+NzwQoTP-r66QZeMPukDJBN0EKqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org list" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114d39448c7aaf055a009248"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/z9lSFQG6SBmyLRYFBvPp71RdOP8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info - double stack coexistence
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:56:32 -0000

On 25 September 2017 at 10:20, Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Le 25/09/2017 à 10:28, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
>
>>
>> We're talking about what access service is provided to the customers, and
>> there are several that do IPv6 only GTP. Yes, the GTP packets might be
>> carried over IPv4, but the SERVICE provided to the customer is IPv6 only.
>>
>
> Excuse me, Mikael, but it is little possible to claim "IPv6-only" when
> there is IPv4.  One can call it "IPv6-only SERVICE", but there's still IPv4
> - so it's an "IPv4-based IPv6-only SERVICE".
>


That's like saying 6PE isn't good enough, which is ridiculous.
If the end-to-end customer-visible service is IPv6, what's the problem?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email