Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 21 September 2017 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F8113207A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lEPG6Z3Uv6Px for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041EA127517 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id AE453AF; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:31:10 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1505982670; bh=kWzpGXhVN3TwrEuaftRvixOZtKjcnuxiY506JGf4/MU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=4Sei8s4My4LqMPcUnHqTRSlQJpNVJuGD+GZgH7DE+gGnd6q6X5kusVUCKa9XmrTWB LSLIaqwepiN7azCTIUb38O0si1vyePAN3KUk1JYHMt4vO8HYkWW94d90Hl+hpZRGNx CicUDtdcDHuap2AcoUJxJv8UusuoJWIzb6tLnlIk=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9650184; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:31:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:31:10 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <55371780-be6c-49e6-fe40-bf3b4c05fcfd@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709211030060.29378@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es> <a4385de4-ba3e-0b36-1bfd-ef3210fba08c@gmail.com> <6BD0B640-8853-4B32-9B30-936D8F58000F@consulintel.es> <8503DEC8-026D-4AA2-A887-87B29A2B2611@apple.com> <CAKD1Yr1Dh_qPVbKYXU9e9N2EqeKgS9yQYDR9aao9R-zGa3cU=g@mail.gmail.com> <376bfd13-8f22-3255-0f3b-d077cc205cc9@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1V5BsrrEO68ASS1hF-Qj3Q_SsyquXeRx0gNRdNURcKsw@mail.gmail.com> <55371780-be6c-49e6-fe40-bf3b4c05fcfd@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/T1K6ARJWZkj3bgfO5jDCA4NErsA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:31:21 -0000

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:

> I am not sure how the tethered clients will have end-to-end IPv6 if they 
> dont have a prefix dedicated to them.  Or maybe do you propose that to 
> be 64share?

That's what android already does, and have done for years. Probably Apple 
iOS devices as well. RFC7278.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se