IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 25 September 2017 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7398133038 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44wr5KMe9gEE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com (mail-yw0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311FD133020 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u205so3775377ywa.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VJCW1UTs9fgB7UxpFUdzXtA4NfLsVe87qtaD9mcUOQ4=; b=qpr70IgKO81vJsGCEX5XxEY2QuPeEuDQ1HYWzVF+G1Q6/qinLGK6hFJtp8VobFWlYn 15GiBOvRfoRuzdZYDPCPCi65QjhxoL0Kxq+tGMJXDkR2ZyqqrrU+Hyr1YlMrpYNbhUev 6PJIoh4muXB1Z96mtPz3UmHbze4ZFC4g0s1pQ/Idk5zv+0i4128KuNvtcbeNEQb8xGyJ 2SaCgtvdV0Zt9EFp6y9N9yg+tUPIUpUB2xHdWulJFy7462knSwOijWBs88tkzYbLRjqZ bUKnCWjxvEwlZK5Fp92X5Zqzv5zW9UlvDFyVUo2rn28Id5XLVQOJaQlmtFwbp5oG505U QtsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VJCW1UTs9fgB7UxpFUdzXtA4NfLsVe87qtaD9mcUOQ4=; b=OrQO0I5p9CODxBTO5DjzJF2YM3p5adOEPofybFWRRBCbycDS1HwXvQIWWznLo/9bm+ 6Qtv0t7T4avIVi0VZW1P+Yueunb1OBJ8/o5gutPpqw3uHRYwKXbaG46wFiu2NqCG8S+K mTaC+oCD5Fw4wXd0qjaPD9wfn3pC4e4KrrV/HYA8PHPGVh0wPHc01qSpBXyy52r4PmyP WLRZ0m2+E5WmS0LmFaAsY2T41ohy/H07EvZDWPREz4JnCcQ8IL8GHA8qT1mr1PLiMEjo hgGvSriWt/KZw6bVmqYKR9Aeb5WT3zNTLKoMhjNmeDJUGOe4ZN7V0FBmSHb/afIAg1QW SC3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjnhLfeIBozXDQ48QqoXzYW6HOWaGiarWcYhmmVxuCQSiCe7+mJ vL3NjDUaUoAf3eydS0rxE7jS1qE2rbB9N0oW1YdV/0AQ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAmfYLPpuZqmNdrgVJMM1UH1zKQjG2QYSgQHhQcXDaQS2kTWZEKMTZdq3fIwFUSma0mXkO1PCCtPCa5OlEShgM=
X-Received: by 10.13.235.84 with SMTP id u81mr3559312ywe.328.1506303220976; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.214.213 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170922161337.GH45648@Space.Net>
References: <85868796-18C7-48F4-BE69-8D50A1F47EF3@jisc.ac.uk> <472CC0F7-73C2-4A21-8F96-BBC966B01B77@employees.org> <de6b9aac-a3cc-0915-77c7-9fb880c3a16a@gmail.com> <20170921223305.B72A8878E716@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr13ijKCB_71_2vMyGurc3-kSraLJycGxZwf121tjp8u1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170922070719.74AA687A424E@rock.dv.isc.org> <20170922114847.GV45648@Space.Net> <369B3917-D9F3-41D4-A7BD-DAE134310004@employees.org> <D5EA8233.87034%lee@asgard.org> <20170922161018.GG45648@Space.Net> <20170922161337.GH45648@Space.Net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:33:19 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr118Tboxrfn6q8L6puQKf+6Z4ZuNFQ7mfE7RAxAQXkOMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0880146a0b400559f98c13"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/u8r_Fn9_FJBjfFBpl9W-eyR4V1o>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 01:33:44 -0000

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

> Since there is no way to get Samsung to fix their shit (like, Google,
> having proper requirements for Android vendors...)


We actually do have a conformance test for this (but it only affects
devices on Android M or later). If you find devices that fail this test,
please let us know.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email