IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 20 September 2017 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56D81321A0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYdVjoCO0zWk for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70EA413301F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v8KFSc54003529; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:28:38 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C29B20EB50; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6532020EB2E; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v8KFScDm002870; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:28:38 +0200
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es> <85d934b3-ae06-c0ea-3519-4069c8387f0a@gmail.com> <C33DB89E-C005-4A32-9066-C8EE710F3255@consulintel.es> <b16c4ca2-da97-9a5a-0f88-6388ebbda80e@gmail.com> <B9C2822F-56EE-47D8-AAB5-C041A3D22F41@gmail.com> <f23854dd-0952-eedb-802b-8506dc111da7@gmail.com> <355FA9BA-CBE9-41AC-8FA6-B44C15C7420B@gmail.com> <58bb7a08-4595-f9b8-0be4-25bb471ca2db@gmail.com> <CAAedzxrMk10P8g0p5=1m8rANFy6+GvkA7+SrnWLKp3Do7sY5aw@mail.gmail.com> <d441f1cd-7b22-f94f-1fe2-4b12ab47ae21@gmail.com> <39456568-1DF0-4D51-8E94-0FDF3595EB31@consulintel.es> <58c5384b-d7d4-f89b-4e1c-f340d2af6630@gmail.com> <CAAedzxo=ACB-3aJ0_9gwEPav_O3GSPM1j5txZ_aSTphcz=384Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ba8d6507-847c-fea6-75d4-8d5452a17a8d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:28:37 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxo=ACB-3aJ0_9gwEPav_O3GSPM1j5txZ_aSTphcz=384Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/awe9qdnX2TcDHtJdVIFpmJO2S4I>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:28:42 -0000


Le 20/09/2017 à 17:21, Erik Kline a écrit :
>> Ctrl-F also, and that page does not seem to display any correction that says
>> "DHCP" in the last 3 and a half years.
>>
>> But I think CLAT should run DHCP somehow, otherwise it's a non standard way
>> to get Prefix Delegation.  Does it?  (I may download it later and look at
>> it).
> 
> There is no PD wrt 464xlat.  The /64 is implicitly delegated to the
> mobile per the 3GPP architecture, as I'm sure you well know.

I well know 3GPP architecture and 3GPP deployment allows for PD.  That 
is not /64 explicit, and it is any length.

The fact that CLAT wants it to be 64 it is CLAT problem that should be 
solved in CLAT.

> If you want to know how the device learns the DNS64/NAT64 prefix then
> see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7050 .

Noted.

Alex

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email