Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 20 September 2017 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=143688d48d=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B423133073 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9irjef751Mhm for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B984133071 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1505868302; x=1506473102; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=y9zwg8hUAL5qlL9rphEvwQoNA x5eE8KlsqTOzkQK6wg=; b=IgTTixf4RMqmidspfA86rmbm55IF/Hsj0o8Hvsuvt 5K1HzDeDIeWGpwRqBaKL4hT91HlwXgFFHZdaLar7Du0DCEwnO/MTGkuDFUz5riry ejg8DiP6nSxKKuJ70i2bQ8EXbwaF7i9CqhYzGR3aV403mHJBP5rUSx40PGpsWm9i 5w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=Xii8Ut11m/xnwLj1tGTl+qoMr5ifzJ3MaWDP4/8K2TkNF8139S7QhARKDKJt I77RvBt4vdIY5ifEwUkqzJHsgCWlrhN0y89pP9tOOkOvU6sv/KiR5t2OQ hinHYvqS6Ce1lI0TwBhud0wrfkz39zFCKdFcGn805zeBzr19hRTExU=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 20 Sep 2017 02:45:02 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 20 Sep 2017 02:45:01 +0200
Received: from [10.0.5.203] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005560636.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 02:45:01 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170920:md50005560636::tu0PgVHGB8zcXrD6:00001LPS
X-Return-Path: prvs=143688d48d=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.26.0.170902
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:44:39 -0300
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <42850F48-98C1-4EA3-8753-A7D950069C65@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es> <d7c43869-8882-47dc-be63-80a754eb0750@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d7c43869-8882-47dc-be63-80a754eb0750@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Q-Dwe6svyUsWUyPPIrSyxvldF9w>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:45:15 -0000

I will wait for the authors to confirm, but if they don’t have the energy, I’m ready to volunteer for that.

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organización: University of Auckland
Responder a: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Fecha: martes, 19 de septiembre de 2017, 17:37
Para: <v6ops@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

    On 20/09/2017 00:23, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    > Hi all,
    > 
    > RFC6877 (464XLAT) is an informational document.
    > 
    > However, this transition mechanism is the one that has a bigger deployment in terms of number of subscribers using it (hundreds of millions), which I think is even more than ALL the other transition mechanism together.
    > 
    > Doesn’t make any sense, in my opinion to keep it as an informational document, while we have many others that are standards track and don’t have such level of deployment.
    > 
    > I was commenting this last week with a couple of the co-authors of this document, and they have the same opinion.
    > 
    > So, should we aim to do this?
    > 
    > Can we even consider moving it to STD?
    
    It seems reasonable to me, but probably needs a new RFC, because of the
    "Status of this memo" section, so I expect that would lead to nitpicking
    discussions. Do the authors have the energy for that?
    
         Brian
    
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Jordi
    >  
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > **********************************************
    > IPv4 is over
    > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    > http://www.consulintel.es
    > The IPv6 Company
    > 
    > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > v6ops mailing list
    > v6ops@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
    > 
    
    _______________________________________________
    v6ops mailing list
    v6ops@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.