Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Le 21/09/2017 à 13:03, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ a écrit :
> DHCPv6-PD is a good thing to have. I’ve confronted thoughts on DHCPv6
> vs SLAAC … However, I understand it will be nice to have DHCPv6
> implemented everywhere, as for example enterprise environments prefer
> a more controlled environment.
> 
> However, having DHCPv6 doesn’t exclude having 64share as well.

It does: try to run both on a computer and you will see.

In practice: a particular operator had to make some choice some time. 
That choice led to either 64share on an APN, or DHCPv6-PD on another 
APN.  They had some reason to put each such thing on a distinct APN.

It's not simply a matter of having two distinct RFCs.  I can live with 
thousands of RFCs if you wish.  But I cant live with different APN each 
for an RFC.

I dont want a Connection Management software to switch between APNs like 
that.

I am not sure whether I explain this ok, but that's the way it is.

> Otherwise, if we follow your suggestion, we should cleanup 60-70% of
> the protocols that we have, because they are redundant.

In this discussion we talk 64share and DHCPv6-PD.  Pick one.

(for the other 60-70% protocols in MIB we can discuss separately if you 
wish).

Alex

> 
> Regards, Jordi
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original----- De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en
> nombre de Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Responder
> a: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fecha: jueves, 21 de septiembre de
> 2017, 7:57 Para: <v6ops@ietf.org> Asunto: Re: [v6ops] reclassify
> 464XLAT as standard instead of info
> 
> 
> 
> Le 21/09/2017 à 12:33, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ a écrit :
>> Yes, why not?
> 
> Because DHCPv6-PD does that.
> 
> Alex
> 
>> 
>> Regards, Jordi
>> 
>> 
>> -----Mensaje original----- De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en
>> nombre de Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> 
>> Responder a: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fecha: jueves, 21 de
>> septiembre de 2017, 5:35 Para: Mikael Abrahamsson
>> <swmike@swm.pp.se> CC: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org> Asunto:
>> Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le 21/09/2017 à 10:31, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I am not sure how the tethered clients will have end-to-end
>>>> IPv6 if they dont have a prefix dedicated to them.  Or maybe do
>>>> you propose that to be 64share?
>>> 
>>> That's what android already does, and have done for years.
>>> Probably Apple iOS devices as well. RFC7278.
>> 
>> So you propose moving 64share to BCP as well?
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
>> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you
>> ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6
>> Company
>> 
>> This electronic message contains information which may be
>> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
>> the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
>> non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
>> of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
>> attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
>> criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
>> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
>> of this information, even if partially, including attached files,
>> is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so
>> you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
>> communication and delete it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
>> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you
> ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6
> Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged
> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive
> use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
> of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is
> strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you
> are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original
> sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 