Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info - double stack coexistence

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 25 September 2017 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF711342C2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 03:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFgXIlTnUTaF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 03:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F5A134293 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 03:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 93968B1; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:45:16 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1506336316; bh=sqJkXk7cCjEjWZzgtAbIgvAYa6KaGWGTjLg8c3XZzls=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KAVfoPfgz9IIVwiEn3vy7PsV1fgbSH+nSfQ9pKMBmZgGSQP4H9fnYZJ1YKaOx+CqP inEoDizuHReCcnC4l/CCQAK4xBJRSmHzf2hW5oAFy6XQvCLqEx8d8Zq4lHYayQlJSG PDMq+4j07i0oXPTC5fgwQqD8e2Ojjw/hkN0f6Lh0=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9094F84; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:45:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:45:16 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
cc: v6ops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <dc7cf11f-c184-6872-da29-f3892c373d77@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709251244490.18564@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <D5E8043B.86B21%lee@asgard.org> <1BFA3605-4B16-4331-A7BA-3BDECBCA64EC@gmail.com> <85868796-18C7-48F4-BE69-8D50A1F47EF3@jisc.ac.uk> <472CC0F7-73C2-4A21-8F96-BBC966B01B77@employees.org> <de6b9aac-a3cc-0915-77c7-9fb880c3a16a@gmail.com> <20170921223305.B72A8878E716@rock.dv.isc.org> <122454EE-64C5-4768-A6A9-1AD0E872F5F9@employees.org> <2a879713-bfd0-2ba0-cb67-53726f6e1faf@gmail.com> <41c808ef-b2c0-6e74-e61d-e89fcebe5e0a@gmail.com> <FA8911A1-CE3E-40E2-A11F-12303A3B4D1C@asgard.org> <e38bb7d2-1376-e790-8c20-19d54ec6b163@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709251025270.18564@uplift.swm.pp.se> <30eddc4a-c2cc-0e6a-9a39-7db255705b16@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709251152340.18564@uplift.swm.pp.se> <e5e878a2-c26e-57d4-5e23-718a16e7bc5a@gmail.com> <7CBE3779-8A7F-4A77-A83A-A73B20600C92@consulintel.es> <1130b720-3b6c-11ed-10dc-35dc4591e402@gmail.com> <254C395D-5903-4C40-857A-24AB396BA1FA@consulintel.es> <dc7cf11f-c184-6872-da29-f3892c373d77@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/o1uT6y2kD6i6XQb0_sQFM-txoy8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info - double stack coexistence
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:45:19 -0000

On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:

> It's called "double stack".

Actually, it's called "dual stack".

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se