IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Tue, 19 September 2017 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C2013308F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xf83Ws0_SGIY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [192.159.10.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5C3132D42 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.5.241] (r190-64-69-50.su-static.adinet.com.uy [190.64.69.50] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8JLUnI0021075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:30:51 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <f23854dd-0952-eedb-802b-8506dc111da7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:30:47 -0300
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F2839117-925A-4B7D-9D6C-FED0ED990B52@delong.com>
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es> <85d934b3-ae06-c0ea-3519-4069c8387f0a@gmail.com> <C33DB89E-C005-4A32-9066-C8EE710F3255@consulintel.es> <b16c4ca2-da97-9a5a-0f88-6388ebbda80e@gmail.com> <B9C2822F-56EE-47D8-AAB5-C041A3D22F41@gmail.com> <f23854dd-0952-eedb-802b-8506dc111da7@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (owen.delong.com [192.159.10.2]); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5VNgjYxpWIdObdjt_r8dwRb6fYA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:31:56 -0000

> On Sep 19, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Fred,
> 
> Let me comment.
> 
> Le 19/09/2017 à 22:41, Fred Baker a écrit :
>> Chair hat off.
>> If it were ONLY about IPv4, I might agree with you, or suggest
>> another working group. 464XLAT is about connecting an IPv6-only
>> (subset of a) network to an IPv4 network,
> 
> If it is an IPv6-only (subset of a) network then it must run DHCPv6-PD to get a prefix.  DHCPv6-PD is Standards Track.  I did not see DHCPv6-PD on networks where 464XLAT is present.

This statement simply isn’t true.

Lots of IPv6 only networks exist that do not use DHCP at all.

Owen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email