IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 20 September 2017 05:04 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099EE13303A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TL7JJf6c1MFW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA21132FA7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v8K54CLZ031693; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:04:12 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 23543201ED0; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:04:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0965E200ED2; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:04:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.84.27] ([132.166.84.27]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v8K54BEW003583; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:04:11 +0200
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es> <85d934b3-ae06-c0ea-3519-4069c8387f0a@gmail.com> <C33DB89E-C005-4A32-9066-C8EE710F3255@consulintel.es> <b16c4ca2-da97-9a5a-0f88-6388ebbda80e@gmail.com> <B9C2822F-56EE-47D8-AAB5-C041A3D22F41@gmail.com> <f23854dd-0952-eedb-802b-8506dc111da7@gmail.com> <F2839117-925A-4B7D-9D6C-FED0ED990B52@delong.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <84a25d02-45ab-0403-6899-4e26843a76e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:04:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F2839117-925A-4B7D-9D6C-FED0ED990B52@delong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wO0gA2N3h_R_KG31NOgWA6zWVJg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:04:23 -0000


Le 19/09/2017 à 23:30, Owen DeLong a écrit :
> 
>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Fred,
>>
>> Let me comment.
>>
>> Le 19/09/2017 à 22:41, Fred Baker a écrit :
>>> Chair hat off.
>>> If it were ONLY about IPv4, I might agree with you, or suggest
>>> another working group. 464XLAT is about connecting an IPv6-only
>>> (subset of a) network to an IPv4 network,
>>
>> If it is an IPv6-only (subset of a) network then it must run DHCPv6-PD to get a prefix.  DHCPv6-PD is Standards Track.  I did not see DHCPv6-PD on networks where 464XLAT is present.
> 
> This statement simply isn’t true.
> 
> Lots of IPv6 only networks exist that do not use DHCP at all.

I mean IPv6 subnet like a cellular-WiFi-Ethernet small router.  That is 
mobile, needs a prefix.

And I mean DHCPv6-PD, not DHCP.

Those IPv6 networks that dont need PD are those that are not mobile.

Alex

> 
> Owen
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email