Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 19 September 2017 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEF3133085 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Glo__UYap9ti for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FF8F134294 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v8JGN3XL007859 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:23:03 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AD21E20E3D8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:23:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30A920E30D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:23:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v8JGN3F3020067 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:23:03 +0200
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <85d934b3-ae06-c0ea-3519-4069c8387f0a@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:23:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/k_4kesBngo49y3e0kG6HqsPU0Q0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:23:08 -0000

Sounds as trying to impose 464xlat to everyone else?

My little IoT IPv6 cellular device does not run 464xlat and neither 
IPv4.  If 464xlat becomes Stds Track does it mean that it MUST run 
464xlat?  I would disagree with that.

Alex

Le 19/09/2017 à 14:23, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> RFC6877 (464XLAT) is an informational document.
> 
> However, this transition mechanism is the one that has a bigger deployment in terms of number of subscribers using it (hundreds of millions), which I think is even more than ALL the other transition mechanism together.
> 
> Doesn’t make any sense, in my opinion to keep it as an informational document, while we have many others that are standards track and don’t have such level of deployment.
> 
> I was commenting this last week with a couple of the co-authors of this document, and they have the same opinion.
> 
> So, should we aim to do this?
> 
> Can we even consider moving it to STD?
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
>   
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>