Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 25/09/2017 à 12:44, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> 
>> The other is pure human reluctance to allow it to work.  The reason
>>  invoked for that is that "it is not needed, because CLAT does
>> it".
> 
> My guess would be that we do not have DHCPv6-PD in mobile networks 
> because RFC7278 works well enough for most deployment scenarios,

If it worked that well it were not INFORMATIONAL.

> and it's a pain to get DHCPv6-PD into both mobile core and UEs

For UE it is not a pain.  Again: for UE it is not a pain.  Stop claiming 
it is a pain.  There are DHCPv6 Android apps in the Store doing that. 
There are numerous software packages running on Androind doing DHCPv6 PD.

What _is_ a pain is explicit blocking by Android OS of DHCPv6 software.

(the modem pain is nothing compared to the above).

> (chicken and egg problem, plus "what we have seems to work for most"
> (ie 64SHARE)).

I disagree.  I dont know what you call "most".

64share is a non-scalable technology, should be get rid of.

This 64share, together with the 64bit limit in Address Architecture, 
stops growth at the edges.

Alex


>