Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> Thu, 21 September 2017 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E19E134304 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jisc.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7-LKlqT8coB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [207.82.80.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E5821329B5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc.ac.uk; s=mimecast20170213; t=1505980937; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=Ap0Djy+8Jktd+rqwMtWOSd7EWpj0I17iuJ5o8hCdTDc=; b=M4dj0jCkgOjZLqfnjcVBVIMSdFPXrXFl8MA5Uc8wZyyuIaPy8LfTdN8iPqnM0cRhWGaEm+jJ3uTP7ZG9aEjws4dVzfjj2ASoaVe0u8XwK+qg3X2LC/hIcu1vuroYMPqdQo+Mo8KII1Q9Z+3fG2CP33zEusHAgC+60Jk9wK8zEt4=
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01lp0208.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.208]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-32-TAzTJJs9PlGOyWNuMCT2Ng-1; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 09:02:13 +0100
Received: from AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.163.188.14) by AM3PR07MB465.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.113.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.5; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:02:11 +0000
Received: from AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d:9ebf:900:b590]) by AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d:9ebf:900:b590%14]) with mapi id 15.20.0077.011; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:02:11 +0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
CC: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
Thread-Index: AQHTMiM47BtgCrn3L0KXBwQzDrO91qK95VoAgABFq4CAABYogIAADRWAgAB4wQCAADSSAA==
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:02:11 +0000
Message-ID: <6499D02A-F773-433B-BD42-40109E20E424@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es> <85d934b3-ae06-c0ea-3519-4069c8387f0a@gmail.com> <C33DB89E-C005-4A32-9066-C8EE710F3255@consulintel.es> <b16c4ca2-da97-9a5a-0f88-6388ebbda80e@gmail.com> <B9C2822F-56EE-47D8-AAB5-C041A3D22F41@gmail.com> <f23854dd-0952-eedb-802b-8506dc111da7@gmail.com> <355FA9BA-CBE9-41AC-8FA6-B44C15C7420B@gmail.com> <58bb7a08-4595-f9b8-0be4-25bb471ca2db@gmail.com> <CAAedzxrMk10P8g0p5=1m8rANFy6+GvkA7+SrnWLKp3Do7sY5aw@mail.gmail.com> <d441f1cd-7b22-f94f-1fe2-4b12ab47ae21@gmail.com> <39456568-1DF0-4D51-8E94-0FDF3595EB31@consulintel.es> <58c5384b-d7d4-f89b-4e1c-f340d2af6630@gmail.com> <8AC03AD2-A7C0-48ED-BFD1-54AEF6A2C29B@consulintel.es> <75a6ea1b-de5d-5b8d-b3d9-d24edbb7bfad@gmail.com> <3521F710-56E4-4950-9EA0-6ECC58219F11@delong.com> <1c0b744f-05ef-6df0-9233-9e86d3de7c8e@gmail.com> <DD38869A-815E-4456-92E8-1F545CDCCB22@delong.com> <add60b73-17a3-ca99-39e1-e58b7002344e@gmail.com> <3F99667F-56A6-487E-9AA6-D0FCB0BB4450@employees.org> <c658bf07-9df4-4c01-4ca5-5aa10013d62c@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c658bf07-9df4-4c01-4ca5-5aa10013d62c@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
x-originating-ip: [194.82.140.195]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM3PR07MB465; 20:MhPJxa0pd+k93HCIhMEAffhFT2gtReAW9tqMqRUTA6IM4XVwXsiNzaBZ0mOkEcNVn/ghRMdHY11Iyc31Kn+mseahnClIZcyccloQDLVTmpKfRNX04T7cnHiKvPR3CLtIS8QZwFTmeS8BR629Z9KjXCFlK8ibuX9bph4k8MWh3BM=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e2aea84f-32b6-44fb-ebfb-08d500c71057
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254152)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603199)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:AM3PR07MB465;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM3PR07MB465:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM3PR07MB465C7E31C39025FC6E3CF69D6660@AM3PR07MB465.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(100000703101)(100105400095)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281529075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560025)(20161123558100)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:AM3PR07MB465; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:AM3PR07MB465;
x-forefront-prvs: 04371797A5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(346002)(376002)(199003)(189002)(24454002)(8676002)(81166006)(76176999)(81156014)(50986999)(25786009)(6916009)(68736007)(42882006)(8936002)(50226002)(6506006)(6436002)(6486002)(5250100002)(2950100002)(2906002)(93886005)(33656002)(3280700002)(3660700001)(14454004)(97736004)(74482002)(53546010)(229853002)(966005)(305945005)(36756003)(6306002)(478600001)(6246003)(99286003)(53936002)(83716003)(101416001)(6116002)(102836003)(39060400002)(2900100001)(7736002)(86362001)(189998001)(72206003)(82746002)(106356001)(3846002)(5660300001)(6512007)(105586002)(66066001)(4326008)(54906003)(786003)(316002)(57306001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM3PR07MB465; H:AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-ID: <672909EE9A14ED498197C941E51A2867@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Sep 2017 08:02:11.4701 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM3PR07MB465
X-MC-Unique: TAzTJJs9PlGOyWNuMCT2Ng-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/lWEph4D4664Pcc3OMpcL1gtiWGk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:02:21 -0000

Hi,

> On 21 Sep 2017, at 05:54, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Le 20/09/2017 à 23:41, Ole Troan a écrit :
>>> But you cant have simultaneously CLAT and DHCPv6-PD on the same
>>> client. Because CLAT wants that to be a /64 prefix.  It will break
>>> when the client gets a /63.
>>> Moreover, design suggestions from CLAT assume that /64 is
>>> sufficient. That is wrong - /64 is not sufficient.
>>>> There are lots of cases where more than one solution to the same
>>>> problem becomes a standards track RFC.
>>> But one wont prohibit the other.
>>> CLAT prohibits DHCPv6-PD.
>> RFC6877 section 6.3 states the opposite.
> 
> Ole,
> 
> RFCs are one thing, and I agree with you.  And here we do RFCs.
> 
> But very much of what RFCs do is from implementations.
> 
> It's hard to claim RFC this and RFC that if on the other hand it is clear that Android blocks[*] DHCPv6 straight.  It looks like we would stick our head in the sand.
> 
> Androids are very numerous devices, and RFCs are less numerous.
> 
> Here, in this operations group, there is need that Android accepts these
> RFCs.
> 
> And we need that before we even talk moving an Android-only CLAT from
> INFORMATIONAL to something else.

There’s now CLAT support in various Windows platforms too, isn’t there?

I don’t think we should tangle up the address configuration debate with 464XLAT (as much as I’d personally like to see Android support DHCPv6..).

Tim

> Alex
> PS: to support the claim that Android explicitely blocks DHCPv6, I can
> provide pointers to public Google pages, numerous requests of DHCPv6
> integration in Android (to avoid need of 'rooting' the devices), the
> availability of DHCPv6 app in Android store that runs only on WiFi and
> must 'root', invitations from competitor OSs to bring DHCPv6 there
> instead of Android, and more.
> 
>> Ole
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>