Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 25 September 2017 09:24 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FA21330B0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TfPc8SetQ4XM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB191320C9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v8P9OKlg012483 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:24:20 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0643C20916E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:24:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CBC2091AC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:24:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v8P9OJQC029956 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:24:19 +0200
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <de6b9aac-a3cc-0915-77c7-9fb880c3a16a@gmail.com> <20170921223305.B72A8878E716@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr13ijKCB_71_2vMyGurc3-kSraLJycGxZwf121tjp8u1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170922070719.74AA687A424E@rock.dv.isc.org> <20170922114847.GV45648@Space.Net> <369B3917-D9F3-41D4-A7BD-DAE134310004@employees.org> <D5EA8233.87034%lee@asgard.org> <20170922161018.GG45648@Space.Net> <20170922161337.GH45648@Space.Net> <CAAedzxpGp6FT6OqNLtnW4aMzAaJX5bjXVox=V1O1KCgFb2eRWw@mail.gmail.com> <20170924175047.GR45648@Space.Net> <CAKD1Yr1PG0JK7-SDX=aKpBOSiAHVNWSvRt4A2=N2vZdefrm0zg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e4f3b5ba-2e75-5654-2bf1-7cbd0322bc0e@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:24:19 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1PG0JK7-SDX=aKpBOSiAHVNWSvRt4A2=N2vZdefrm0zg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/X1d97p5N5qeD2n5QD2m-HRS3Kxc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:24:24 -0000


Le 25/09/2017 à 03:36, Lorenzo Colitti a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net 
> <mailto:gert@space.net>> wrote:
> 
>     Now, how can we get all those vendors with a big S to ship Android
>     upgrades for their phones on the market?
> 
>     (We'd *really* like bring back this host to the IPv6 world... and we
>     can't while the market share of unfixed devices is still so high.  So
>     maybe in a year or so...)
> 
> 
> Can the radio station hand off to dual-stack URLs for working devices 
> and to IPv4-only URLs for broken devices? For example, based on user-agent?

I am not sure what do you mean?

There is no 'radio station' in 3GPP.  There are however FM radio 
stations if you wish.

Alex

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>