IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 21 September 2017 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1946F1331E3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 09:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id usQ8IxLl6zp2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 09:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 469F713247A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 09:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id CE427AF; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:04:23 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1506009863; bh=Q+ggmCFNUUOk7XyJG4OTOsL1e4DReynMkbMosD0iIPE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=3dK2YDZaN9IeJEuUQDo0m/DaDQe0C4fz8fcGMgCreaKMNWDUowsVheZxRgDgaa4fI 4wRI08+Uv/M0sLEpjWXSyIFMI0zLkxqe7wyfYb1BmL/7IyP8wyHzrv3VGy2yS0oo6j fiRvbPRLQaPo6tHCxSSJPKnU9OLu3G5GcSAIBYWs=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC27D84; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:04:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:04:23 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
cc: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <31cb26f1-3fbf-fcc6-3948-3878a4b792bb@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709211803210.18564@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es> <58bb7a08-4595-f9b8-0be4-25bb471ca2db@gmail.com> <CAAedzxrMk10P8g0p5=1m8rANFy6+GvkA7+SrnWLKp3Do7sY5aw@mail.gmail.com> <d441f1cd-7b22-f94f-1fe2-4b12ab47ae21@gmail.com> <39456568-1DF0-4D51-8E94-0FDF3595EB31@consulintel.es> <58c5384b-d7d4-f89b-4e1c-f340d2af6630@gmail.com> <8AC03AD2-A7C0-48ED-BFD1-54AEF6A2C29B@consulintel.es> <75a6ea1b-de5d-5b8d-b3d9-d24edbb7bfad@gmail.com> <3521F710-56E4-4950-9EA0-6ECC58219F11@delong.com> <1c0b744f-05ef-6df0-9233-9e86d3de7c8e@gmail.com> <DD38869A-815E-4456-92E8-1F545CDCCB22@delong.com> <add60b73-17a3-ca99-39e1-e58b7002344e@gmail.com> <3F99667F-56A6-487E-9AA6-D0FCB0BB4450@employees.org> <c658bf07-9df4-4c01-4ca5-5aa10013d62c@gmail.com> <C1B89168-E48F-4B4E-B558-88F8CC90C815@delong.com> <96c18643-e391-e9c7-7d23-e90bc4827c2d@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGQtf=E=UB=FU4_8bLVQiJsN_Y-qLRi02=wGgJ2E0zzdRw@mail.gmail.com> <31cb26f1-3fbf-fcc6-3948-3878a4b792bb@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ymNdQMRQ0Gcc4iHA3PIEsKyHtXI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:04:28 -0000

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:

> Good, but have you tried OpenWRT CLAT and dhcpv6-pd on cellular at the 
> same time?  I tell you they dont run together neither on OpenWRT nor 
> anywhere else.
>
> If you claim otherwise: please tell me the modem name, manufacturer.

There is nothing in the standards that tell us these can't be used 
together. What you're talking about is an implementation problem, not a 
standardisation problem.

Just because current modem implementations do the wrong thing doesn't mean 
this can't work.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email