IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 25 September 2017 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C3613219C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wHyo99-Efndn for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4F8B132D89 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u130so8126013oib.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7Vs2MeyUPPlm+50O4SOi8JYQ8H8p5v5hHq580j80DsU=; b=letR5np/vwrZWQopII00YFsh8mL2Hc2Mh7Am9ZuTtA5mbKDnS9LIIkMQYqVHnd/FUW FB9DzFE+1JszpSvluhua/4jjORC0KYuPK+jb+vyQwJTSHkl+9VpI+K2PROxLPl1TCDbb 1svuN91gUuQSoG3ZfmGwAjvDi0oIQSby0ZzK6as441EI7Q88/ekKSyN0uD5jSEAxTd1m REWTDeUY3M0rx1ZPr0BVmX3Q2RvPDnqoctVgpzV+i/q5sT0lcT7BX8zCgytuA9vaCHkP nzxuFSe2bdQ/IJYPosowKIoW97VTcIWcIERB1tYGloXZ7QXQ+z5LtJgdggOwrYtrkx1X nyjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7Vs2MeyUPPlm+50O4SOi8JYQ8H8p5v5hHq580j80DsU=; b=DHRYf+2u3btmNOiPwUWomDnhaZeJ7NU3DvMo8+pl6EOYsLmKNmAreUWt510VP+5y/v niYmqslhi2VsYHKGUxRXPPUwnE7DjFzkY/sA0tWctuqWjmK8tuloNtsF1QQD/YJs8Xn/ /ct5xpR5JcpwLR+9gUpt8Q8uGNMUoLL5AhE3Y8Tt4HBq/AcT8Wqu7+SAWXbAKpEXg/0p Te+/yDImE3oyxjiX8zUuBcgC4s4o70lRuOWtXQB8M1ZkjwOoT9NN1gyc/SKFhhvX9nHi zdnFq4pEcYfwjYSpKvik6/n3wV8WDNYwwB64qs/+ZfcBX3WxbHsCNePh3JHVzpzvSKnL 5kRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgcyNASoDtBgkWUboZz6uzyddHAnZ+om6Ya8pBO8AWoXhiFho/k f1geNdktVB55723s+i8EYGz9kuW2
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDsinuiqUFu4MtcEYuLuS0GtDI0rU9pS55GvaCOSn7lHrFp96+zH2SGtQiUJOS8Z1DxH7bCjw==
X-Received: by 10.202.177.70 with SMTP id a67mr10357921oif.35.1506367893864; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:e::163f? ([2600:8802:5600:e::163f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm404253otg.30.2017.09.25.12.31.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3445.1.6\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170925120507.GE45648@Space.Net>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:31:31 -0700
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <79BA8440-3BF6-42B1-9B90-C37BBB2FB66A@gmail.com>
References: <20170922212502.E0CFF87B00BA@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr0VdmS0APz-G5VmxMNY1y9Kj+g0VP4Jx0_MXLkqkVyE8Q@mail.gmail.com> <4bf16a40ffd44e9498babf7094b1e526@orange.com> <f8b54014-c5af-d63f-5eed-35f19728b4f7@gmail.com> <0E9B8640-E102-4AB0-8908-28A988795861@consulintel.es> <ba63f464-cf1e-69d1-4d34-c961a8fef286@gmail.com> <2292D724-BF30-4530-A6BE-0B33E30043D0@consulintel.es> <fa203bf8-31a5-c8ef-8559-419616774787@gmail.com> <20170925102250.GA45648@Space.Net> <81661be5-4a1a-1f8a-10d0-829e775546d9@gmail.com> <20170925120507.GE45648@Space.Net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.1.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wDpvLnwawWM_PsOWvyNn0t5WkFg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 19:31:36 -0000

Speaking as chair, the person who can actually ask someone to "please go away".

I'm not asking anyone to "go away". I will note that IETF working groups do much of their work on mailing lists, and have active participants who operate on their lists primarily, and in some cases only, on those lists. You are each active in v6ops, and appreciated by the chairs.

That said, Alexandre, I have to agree with Gert that the views you have expressed in the past few days have added little to the discussion. They differ from many of the networks and deployments discussed in v6ops, and aren't particularly helpful. In specific cases, as others have noted, they are incorrect.

What I, as chair, will ask - of each of us - is that if you have comments to make that are personal rather than technical, please address them privately to the person in question. We have close to 1000 people on this mailing list, and the other 999 don't really need the noise.

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 5:05 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:29:49PM +0200, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> Le 25/09/2017 à 12:22, Gert Doering a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:51:29AM +0200, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>>>> I also heard the term "native IPv6".  This means there is no IPv4.
>>> 
>>> "native IPv6" usually means "IPv6 is not tunneled over IPv4"
>> 
>> That's for you.
>> 
>> For me "native IPv6" means there is no IPv4.  And there are many such 
>> networks.
> 
> Would you please just go away?  Redefining everything in different ways
> from everyone else, and then complaining that things will not work out
> the way you think it is is just wasting everyones time.
> 
> Gert Doering
>        -- NetMaster
> -- 
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
> 
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email