IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Mon, 25 September 2017 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD081332C8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5YCqMNaXm43r for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22C5C1331F2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id b195so17645184wmb.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Km7u52bkA9NutKA2HwS+GsXqb3QcTGtCUOepgF2t9YA=; b=vtJsqx22wHtd2FWYUIBgyWnxwvxKY6LLTCrF0Zn2f1h2fSRFkqFwA9HRmIju3NYxtZ WUeD/yDt8eTQxU+tuGOgolv36FLV9uREdelHpapx9iOOeaSks9jJH8iezbpXiPo8U+5K zMfrlWqrz3SouEHFg1tlL6u8mIOsC1QiDegIrKJxfTtxYGs7+vwcNcQgZu98uwAJledY s2UfxvoQ7Y50nE3L/ArZH2Gh2YtkUPJLbRj1BT4pWXSGzbGuOaGO+I2quIvQ3AaAaGCm QZDtEoUz5+OkMeeooWAxC3xoivQMpMVnTxzXJAVDIT03uCIh9uehgiSPN7iE8NE38F2P sBzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Km7u52bkA9NutKA2HwS+GsXqb3QcTGtCUOepgF2t9YA=; b=NBwjuBEJcNHtNfchYL3PvXCjDwkdUvctyXB3jv65yoKp1XPsOC70AbK2015+I9Teka 390LNIGnN6EKbQUzbkaHCkS6dmpeiCPQkubeuZ+JcbPg8DGawVMx75xYmkKO+R3994l1 fO9Md6cUBZCFzcrNbnGMgSy2anR8TQg/xn0JdIq+t0YiKC4u2eH/2zb6JyGQ08SZWExl VZDEWMJ7gJhXUlxUl163d9bFCwRo5WXo1DYZQLT8LDVpfyh0egsmc5GNlKkKA5MAbCNE Al1BupbG9g3w9Xc039sIGbED34AYtKN0SVAD2fci9xGB5nx9qFqu48PLgnAeBR2aVS0o XeZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUi6avaGtPKlNPtPrcNqI1S2tZ0qQRf7jxbLSL+F4YoYb0IPIj5v Yx/IPCN5vHgXya/LXTAYzQNL17DddYsqIWjTa5FAwg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCiCjjZV4/lkSer+tGhZB0ABoLDmN8Uj9UJsGvodfGc7mZc3jbwrtqBsUiiB6yckBevuW/c5BjFboG5iZoz5tM=
X-Received: by 10.28.238.218 with SMTP id j87mr10124894wmi.44.1506332883249; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.213.9 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ba63f464-cf1e-69d1-4d34-c961a8fef286@gmail.com>
References: <E48DDA04-C058-4992-906E-8C8BC0E102AB@consulintel.es> <1BFA3605-4B16-4331-A7BA-3BDECBCA64EC@gmail.com> <85868796-18C7-48F4-BE69-8D50A1F47EF3@jisc.ac.uk> <472CC0F7-73C2-4A21-8F96-BBC966B01B77@employees.org> <de6b9aac-a3cc-0915-77c7-9fb880c3a16a@gmail.com> <20170921223305.B72A8878E716@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr13ijKCB_71_2vMyGurc3-kSraLJycGxZwf121tjp8u1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170922070719.74AA687A424E@rock.dv.isc.org> <20170922114847.GV45648@Space.Net> <369B3917-D9F3-41D4-A7BD-DAE134310004@employees.org> <20170922122146.GY45648@Space.Net> <20170922212502.E0CFF87B00BA@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr0VdmS0APz-G5VmxMNY1y9Kj+g0VP4Jx0_MXLkqkVyE8Q@mail.gmail.com> <4bf16a40ffd44e9498babf7094b1e526@orange.com> <f8b54014-c5af-d63f-5eed-35f19728b4f7@gmail.com> <0E9B8640-E102-4AB0-8908-28A988795861@consulintel.es> <ba63f464-cf1e-69d1-4d34-c961a8fef286@gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:47:41 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxqEeh4o4o=ZZbFh62XyjoiiKLPO__7HEE2CZxw9VWcUjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="001a1146d9e273b933055a0074fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XTp5temgvlyN3cjJ9rshaFoQUiE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:48:07 -0000

When speaking from the perspective of a client OS I have frequently
observed and understood the phrase "IPv6-only network" to mean that
the link to which the client is connected only provisions and forwards
IPv6 packets.

IPv4 /may/ be available to the client as a service on these "IPv6-only
networks" within this definition, whether by 464xlat or VPN or by some
other means.  But that never seems to change the implied meaning of
"IPv6-only network" in these contexts.

Just an observation.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email