IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 21 September 2017 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A4E1330B2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sy5H8vd2hmud for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF5BE132D14 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id t127so3426921ywg.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=33rAT+XhpSJve4/LSY549BPZIEAjXo82q/o3ekDKPFk=; b=oewvqfkrXp0dZiP+x2DZcjRiWpUvU/OIgOuvpGlw2HxtBqqyNXTy+SmRkycc2puLmY ycr8U2tKOZkuT2mnDgbnRZcgODziJF5x2vBR1a7JT4V1gxjsLdezEqNmtZBuJ4pLk9ET sOmWMYjFwoNCXvlHFzYWP6vvEo9Z5wX0NCWISrPrQ/FOARYNtviRwR6LoTXOSj/OyW/V fZt3hsf2bBtbMUrj1q+BKRu0mpDGeXy1m6/Wy+FVQLOKu32e1tbJ63N2GvNxmpm9uRxE xM6n6QKvmsfDhyNvdSk8wVXp5RKo6jQRAJdJzum5fXmbe8ckbKss9qzr1ZgiK5mwW4pC SOdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=33rAT+XhpSJve4/LSY549BPZIEAjXo82q/o3ekDKPFk=; b=gDtfEiXhZPzSX58rCnHx7c9+cGalSjgmoH3PgEbvRNEF3tXznmopcrcF8+9rr/PG9r P2SWKIxCgPLw97ilxM+TMcdxxokc8dPC6m2xUdFrwvzBHbViODeoAZcxL4K77tzBaX4k KSpI9IsF5lO5RV6Ahn1bTog6gUZr5PsyJW1ETN3bcrlvycuXHR2AuUgnHs6SGNtqrRGD XRofpt08aV6sJpQv/blrHjTI4jP+KGYc0GJTwBwk08vv+J+rVWMDKlT1J2/d+AOmuUht 7XmRQmtT5i2+CaVcUWrh+W+OJVAArHv1BIcCaOcGj9VSwxvjtYJhuf7DLVFN6X0KGcgh 91JA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUi711BOJe0h+fWRJB2W6V+pK0LzlKJkYnMOLzKR+Vgnn5raAGnU R+zeyk7y0ggfbOHZKMq6fcJvn440jTArq08W3BGSDjFV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBq+VKASDRwD44zjSp2B0ArzDbewplQj7YKm9Fe1bNe5RiGYW7Mn+9kWF6aNLlGR6PbuaJBNKdLi0HhWkPvsko=
X-Received: by 10.37.204.137 with SMTP id l131mr886012ybf.259.1505976747592; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.214.213 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <376bfd13-8f22-3255-0f3b-d077cc205cc9@gmail.com>
References: <C1017FAF-91C3-4CA3-89C2-B64FF5100E41@consulintel.es> <a4385de4-ba3e-0b36-1bfd-ef3210fba08c@gmail.com> <6BD0B640-8853-4B32-9B30-936D8F58000F@consulintel.es> <8503DEC8-026D-4AA2-A887-87B29A2B2611@apple.com> <CAKD1Yr1Dh_qPVbKYXU9e9N2EqeKgS9yQYDR9aao9R-zGa3cU=g@mail.gmail.com> <376bfd13-8f22-3255-0f3b-d077cc205cc9@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:52:06 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1V5BsrrEO68ASS1hF-Qj3Q_SsyquXeRx0gNRdNURcKsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c07d2481538d60559ad8917"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wfz3_UBpawh8BqSxJ36bAaG5kfI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 06:52:30 -0000

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Instead of NAT4464, it would have been possible to use extra IPv6
>> addresses to represent the tethered devices.
>>
>
> If you can make DHCPv6-PD software available on Android without needing
> to root-risk the device, then I can look at making DHCPv6-PD deliver
> these extra addresses.


There's no need for any extra addresses. The traffic is already NATed once
and making IPv4 go from 4464 to 464 is not worth the additional complexity,
particularly because the tethered clients will have end-to-end IPv6.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email