Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Fri, 22 September 2017 11:46 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CEC134306 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 04:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.215
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uhpPRiQdyu4N for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 04:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0111.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.0.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E92D0132D51 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 04:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=1JMJ1eP9ocqbYPHriwy9K6ug52Ke3tSrN5BF51qr82U=; b=C3lhboT67JT1rW+kzEN9LjxuruMbejvedoGVWL57NE2yw7LMQwFec3oGD7TErIv55gc5vajZx1HRYQfRC25ywHgqTMXm2Hxb4zQ/DxxjkhbNkOMdTHvDOKEEikuEFEnJe/giOgXQ4RN1qs5UmX1rFRmh6/ITFNWBDi9UbNlADx0=
Received: from pc6 (109.146.128.123) by AM5PR0701MB2996.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:203:48::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.5; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:46:25 +0000
Message-ID: <011901d33398$2ee547e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:04:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [109.146.128.123]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DB6PR07CA0010.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:6:2d::20) To AM5PR0701MB2996.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:203:48::18)
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 50884a11-b721-47a8-7e5b-08d501af8e3f
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254152)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603199)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2996;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2996; 3:ltMcCENQMwL/jhbAwsLpKPwT5+iqriJzCWRMFxyl9tdeHaKNG5wnQNZ9Ya1ekS/97XuZOocb2HeKMGP7b9ik9PDmltY/hdj2AZ6hqFLmwbWsILOsZCMQtN2VY//xyl1wwiSdQHJdI4W/aaTXqvKCsZPTMWEiSCiEZKAdPKG5RhrV0bc9HI7kN0bCdF7EGeWiOw6Cm/4QT+9vca3L8XW0b5A/vgw0TY/cy2+DvRWzC5KorabuDmCwUW4skn2pstIP; 25:NXEtnELqctLHf94rzabvvKCnz5G//bFUeSjy+53Gf9+vDJ9sl4DyYBdV7o/BDTLNncP2am1GocLF1owUPvvOxTrc+jVQ0LP5nEJvKU/Xhe0wg/K+5jdut6/54hbCmBvYizc0sdvT4k5CBPqKTOkXmB6iQJFg2OLtzvxbXWWt38693h0j9YkY7bTKoa/lK2ORpgE5uu5gkRMob3LMfYCQOIi0UEn9sPebq4A7o3G67SFA73RgJuBZ1FYKa0uTlZ1Ry8vSgaoFIIkL9MOpCybidXazsUDzlfVekG0uuPYS+OMl4sMbe60dxSyJnehNBjABPVCWGQsRwKq+fFKde6UB7Q==; 31:12peT5Ko6iICBwebPbM5eLnd37f+PeKnjng8hyNkBb0lhJYfg7xFciqopNMDG7ETKuXofJxGEYaINw+dVbRNWa88qxIXhl+SFj+4/Z2iCeteJSY+iHv1dvsfTwwC10CAQyWxquwguv4Pv+zz7wIR+ddcsSnIj2N+aYGOYxuOnzhJDVCSnH7X7yz50OtMZ7IEM0uvCVCFILkhAAi/kE2mdRsAgmJZo8AWGvha3xz4QgE=
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM5PR0701MB2996:
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2996; 20:Nkqifmjy3jHfdntj5xTRJLzti8cJp/3SC8OBsqvtQbcywJ/w70Bt97yHOAan6sAfc71myTUH6WcQd2yyppeiUPO4hgtgYVOMgvrBxXR6viPKtTAMAF9PgBFRWNO1xEpnlKPkOh2v+YsaLPVon/TYTlnFgc+g08AIFXvz2vnts/nMr39sEd1PwfkRdEyPyWZFNCs0uOLmKMmpQ6G9OOTfcj1NgCMZv7vT58wnR6foGUHlZFDDxKGD73Y1951Ix1vsf5N97vljSc9iBr6qViOi2ea2LUdWT2Ps77hiLdjedLAOsNn6kthAAff2rXfD7zGg0ULwBgNCyRjoRtzi98Verg==; 4:jDHwccYIMLfckJLyBxjJ7JuLff/RH+zWMJ5Jo/NK7+BwqqitrypZprRzpS4BwUvqwY7y/XxzgoW+kzQZcSdWtmxjTUZBpg15HcclU+lYkkhdp0VCjjgs1Ja3VAOagZaFzhwoMvU/3mw90cioIns4qP8nbR5JsdybEzLfY6zWRA/0uzuRsrPIuN5at4HFP/3ODHB3fIcynI96VSCLCGH+VlPsWXls2XrunKYo+QAJz6XVKwhPua7/4vzBWcKNzGIYV59DvX9/S5Xl9fqm4akhsgL1Igl833O3QNt5RyyLFJY=
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:(178726229863574);
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <AM5PR0701MB29965A9301EB438F8CE4F863A0670@AM5PR0701MB2996.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(61425038)(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(100000703101)(100105400095)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123555025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2996; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2996;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0438F90F17
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(377454003)(199003)(24454002)(53754006)(13464003)(189002)(44736005)(4720700003)(44716002)(47776003)(6116002)(53386004)(62236002)(316002)(16526017)(110136005)(5890100001)(2870700001)(1556002)(53546010)(6246003)(6496005)(39060400002)(25786009)(478600001)(50466002)(97736004)(5660300001)(50226002)(66066001)(68736007)(966005)(23676002)(33646002)(14496001)(81156014)(8936002)(101416001)(8676002)(81166006)(189998001)(1456003)(7736002)(9686003)(305945005)(116806002)(86362001)(81686999)(6486002)(6666003)(81816999)(3846002)(53936002)(4326008)(229853002)(106356001)(2906002)(6306002)(61296003)(105586002)(50986999)(84392002)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2996; H:pc6; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;AM5PR0701MB2996;23: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
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2996; 6:tG5lrT48Evt6fZSvg8FEahXfyyUd4/EpIyWxIN2XcgD5azg+502fFHMIMBcUsoH06dNQcnb49UkvDyNjMKpAkk5KlwHw387iCmTyf8KFIJZncKPQAAx9yZxlqIhyLvxO4wjQxKErSe1imhLW/roIueHPMMIYodGFpo9zBdJEuZgeGjHjjWHRADTbJH2ouNrE7MAKbCD7rZGvSESl9UOQ1VVO9gK/aLGO2OjgGPe60Km/bHMz3HmwbovhJnaIMFaKw+GzCNKUTjzWWCJotevQyRMvGEz1gglWc+4FVjEcQx2JbtIWCeosB7xainZik1xQdmQALZbQsbrEj247nZg85Q==; 5:v3t/La6OtPCSNvJ8mC0R7raSVh4IoTjCAy76CVv9zq5XY+UWq33wo7rcWOBUqPW1OjETkoTNXH2Gby3zlmo+9Dgku9H2hwctHOyqkHSDZu/Jv+ro6iXSJ/9/xuLw/dz87+7UF//Eh4fEtzWhieb2yg==; 24:5x+qSbvob79aNN9/5+78poDoGxlnlGiot5D2IxjiZGnnAOceW2qQ1uSLtO6QKM7ugXsjBTYgZV3FVOZXm34CfH4tVUM9ca6FvhwzHDnay7I=; 7:12llKOTykw3baFwRm5Jfbe1gKYuqjOEi2Q5vI1MyjURvAZ+zzExltqoVR/KzDiofZ9R6+pxplVnRnhOWRuO4yAbIld+MS/4/2N+TLDPNv9NCgFjKYtn0Zhf/XmhIQ+K+QVSQc6cmJhqacLyUnhFIU2xahEXht1qjMiKS3hr5lfr1f5dHOEbTLwRUOla/Uek6FuhnNkwHNvavh0jVH7ME09Zw5NzpN+KBNITHw03/D6g=
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2017 11:46:25.6161 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0701MB2996
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/CcLeZx2Gylptm5_zkraZqpfwLqc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:46:32 -0000
Having done my own homework, the IPR datatracker records IPR against two of the drafts that became RFC6877 and so, by implication, against the RFC itself. My recollection is that this was seen as ok for Informational but not for BCP and was a factor in the change of status of the prospective RFC for it to be Informational. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> To: "Fred Baker" <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>; "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Cc: <v6ops@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 10:41 AM Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fred Baker" <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> > To: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> > Cc: <v6ops@ietf.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 9:27 PM > > > Hmm. Wearing the chair hat, but not making pronouncements. Thinking > through the options and considerations. > > Fred > > What was the final resolution of the IPR claim by China Mobile relating > to this work that caused much bemusement at the time of the approval > thereof and which also may have been a factor in changing the status > from BCP to Informational? > > Tom Petch > > > > > Some reading matter: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-5 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6410 > > RFC 2026 section 4 as updated by 6410. > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6782 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7269 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7335 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7445 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7849 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7934 > > > > I would agree that informational status is probably inappropriate at > this point. I'll note that the progression is not all that unusual; GRE, > for example, was originally informational (RFC 1701), was taken to > Proposed Standard in RFC 2784, and has been updated by RFC 2890. If it > were taken to Internet Standard, we would need to demonstrate the points > raised in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6410#section-2.2. > > > > What gives me pause in using the PS/IS standards track is the issue of > interoperation of multiple implementations. I'm not entirely sure what > that means in an operational procedure or service, which is in my > perception what 464XLAT is. If that is the interoperation of multiple > networks, it might be the interoperation of an IPv6-only (subset of a) > network with other IPv4 networks, as the interoperation of that same > network with IPv6 networks or networks with IPv6 capabilities doesn't > require such services. The description of a BCP in RFC 2026 sounds more > like what we're looking at here. > > > > My thought at the moment (which I can be argued out of) is that the > right status is BCP, and that we would want an updated document that > captures anything we have learned since RFC 6877 was published. > > > > > On Sep 19, 2017, at 5:23 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ > <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > RFC6877 (464XLAT) is an informational document. > > > > > > However, this transition mechanism is the one that has a bigger > deployment in terms of number of subscribers using it (hundreds of > millions), which I think is even more than ALL the other transition > mechanism together. > > > > > > Doesn’t make any sense, in my opinion to keep it as an informational > document, while we have many others that are standards track and don’t > have such level of deployment. > > > > > > I was commenting this last week with a couple of the co-authors of > this document, and they have the same opinion. > > > > > > So, should we aim to do this? > > > > > > Can we even consider moving it to STD? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Jordi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ********************************************** > > > IPv4 is over > > > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > > > http://www.consulintel.es > > > The IPv6 Company > > > > > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged > or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use > of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution > or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > v6ops mailing list > > > v6ops@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > > > _______________________________________________ > > v6ops mailing list > > v6ops@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > >
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lee Howard
- [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… David Schinazi
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… t.petch
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Erik Kline
- [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: reclassif… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: recla… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: recla… Alexandre Petrescu
- [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPAM* S… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPAM* S… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: recla… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: recla… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: recla… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Ca By
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] Forget CLAT Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] dont reclassify 464XLAT as BCP instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Forget CLAT Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Forget CLAT Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Ca By
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Ca By
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Ca By
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… t.petch
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Ca By
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Kossut Tomasz - Hurt
- Re: [v6ops] [*SPAM* Score/Req: 3.9/3.3] Re: [*SPA… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Richard Patterson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instea… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6 and Apple iPhone LTE interface (… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6 and Apple iPhone LTE interface (… james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6 and Apple iPhone LTE interface Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6 and Apple iPhone LTE interface Kossut Tomasz - Hurt
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6 and Apple iPhone LTE interface Alexandre Petrescu