IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> Wed, 20 September 2017 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lee@asgard.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2441321A0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eyZnfPubIUkk for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob10.registeredsite.com (atl4mhob10.registeredsite.com [209.17.115.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E499613202D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.210]) by atl4mhob10.registeredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v8KFjQqM003953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:45:26 -0400
Received: (qmail 31297 invoked by uid 0); 20 Sep 2017 15:45:26 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 72.221.14.183
X-Authenticated-UID: lee@asgard.org
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.160?) (lee@asgard.org@72.221.14.183) by 0 with ESMTPA; 20 Sep 2017 15:45:24 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.2.170228
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:45:17 -0400
From: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es, v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <D5E8043B.86B21%lee@asgard.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/vPDrf9MLVXeGH8B7-Yy-uzW7Uag>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:45:30 -0000


On 9/19/17, 8:23 AM, "v6ops on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ"
<v6ops-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>RFC6877 (464XLAT) is an informational document.
>...
>
>Can we even consider moving it to STD?


I don’t think v6ops can promote it to Standard, or Standards Track. Our
charter doesn’t explicitly say we’re not allowed to do standards work, but
I would want to hear from our AD and check with 6man before promoting it.

Generally, the two tests are rough consensus and multiple interoperable
implementations. 

Lee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email