Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]>]

DHCPv6-PD is a good thing to have. I’ve confronted thoughts on DHCPv6 vs SLAAC … However, I understand it will be nice to have DHCPv6 implemented everywhere, as for example enterprise environments prefer a more controlled environment.

However, having DHCPv6 doesn’t exclude having 64share as well.

Otherwise, if we follow your suggestion, we should cleanup 60-70% of the protocols that we have, because they are redundant.

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: v6ops <[e-mail]> en nombre de Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>
Responder a: <[e-mail]>
Fecha: jueves, 21 de septiembre de 2017, 7:57
Para: <[e-mail]>
Asunto: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info

    
    
    Le 21/09/2017 à 12:33, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ a écrit :
    > Yes, why not?
    
    Because DHCPv6-PD does that.
    
    Alex
    
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Jordi
    >   
    > 
    > -----Mensaje original-----
    > De: v6ops <[e-mail]> en nombre de Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>
    > Responder a: <[e-mail]>
    > Fecha: jueves, 21 de septiembre de 2017, 5:35
    > Para: Mikael Abrahamsson <[e-mail]>
    > CC: "[e-mail] WG" <[e-mail]>
    > Asunto: Re: [v6ops] reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info
    > 
    >      
    >      
    >      Le 21/09/2017 à 10:31, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
    >      > On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
    >      >
    >      >> I am not sure how the tethered clients will have end-to-end IPv6 if
    >      >> they dont have a prefix dedicated to them.  Or maybe do you propose
    >      >> that to be 64share?
    >      >
    >      > That's what android already does, and have done for years. Probably
    >      > Apple iOS devices as well. RFC7278.
    >      
    >      So you propose moving 64share to BCP as well?
    >      
    >      Alex
    >      
    >      >
    >      
    >      _______________________________________________
    >      v6ops mailing list
    >      [e-mail]
    >      https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
    >      
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > **********************************************
    > IPv4 is over
    > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    > http://www.consulintel.es
    > The IPv6 Company
    > 
    > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > v6ops mailing list
    > [e-mail]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
    > 
    
    _______________________________________________
    v6ops mailing list
    [e-mail]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.