IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP Service

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08C93A0DD3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:26:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id he6PYY1mOcby for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B827E3A0DD1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E375C0380; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:26:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:26:31 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=R3yVBOy/76+BAIPgmYDpjq7DSJ5F4AwhHkMyuQGTm Vw=; b=CZHpsDshqpvPMEbdERlxQ3VS6WcBs6EbG7w9c05RBCItduCJGD8fVc1UL J+Kw88BywIz/0YhPPkMONOR09KWTQk4/0WprBLNyhmeekshDEQxyDWiKWJE1sEgg z4ZVSZ8C4u/gAOKrSxh4rP5eRZ8hvq92yKfi6v/HcvNn8BkQeuoQVD+Su5nWhuhY D5vHaECCuTDPdxSmnUue5esWhWXsul6wcVcPiWwi2EO8j8R+gTCno72zaX55ViCk BVIEhgdao1WfuWpGzGJeVBB05vkS4O+D25eEvtzld17N0gwQvIqU8zNYrSRH7HjF pEurR6cn8HTgk6SFinDgRW1CMSDyQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:F060X2az590Z2xBOOsoSt0GMEeY7mBvlGAbi67GRaw7CUNLYTZspOA> <xme:F060X5Yi08Rz79OpzSG2hg0VANcbTaYAC703qJGqMkvtXCLhuNuyePNh8kGEy06_j V3yO7qsFV6IkQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeffedgudeivdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghi thhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtoh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehhfeutdehfefgfefghfekhefguefgieduueegjeek feelleeuieffteefueduueenucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgv thifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:F060Xw_WoGyPPkHoxibhLBkU493DORQHGWGSQ5Gglax9q6eIHQc75Q> <xmx:F060X4oKhF2jWIBnpDhdoQqEzmdWlwrAC-oRByZQCE1tSiVam1zo-A> <xmx:F060Xxo9LBK7-pihxOAJgoTF1DiRCfK97y-6BNLkELed5bafGq9GTQ> <xmx:F060X-3kWFfWqPmH7N4ga6UCwrKx6uWY0GbnSOo6ssJHBQDG4ovJtA>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6887F3280063; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:26:31 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP Service
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <af6ab231024c478bbd28bbec0f9c69c9@cert.org> <0D41F3FD-BA1F-4716-A165-4FE7529431A9@vigilsec.com> <D26DCBB6-3997-4A73-BB46-867B4FD79BD2@eggert.org> <27b80ed2-76fb-aee7-f22d-de56019e9aa9@nostrum.com> <a8bdd67a-13ea-4433-aa38-9cfd48ea28da@network-heretics.com> <0e875497-9986-a0d9-8354-3eac26b7f882@nostrum.com> <a02e15f2-34fb-4124-7ba0-c0ee0070b39f@network-heretics.com> <6a29096e-c76e-9bde-388c-bf411b235346@nostrum.com> <6ff3c8a8-57c9-a278-51ce-ce24fd2dfc0e@network-heretics.com> <01RS3W7DNPHA005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <17A1F2FA-CFDB-4775-8E50-A7842E45F5A7@cable.comcast.com> <3b47a817-0884-2379-6654-cd8d6c2d914b@htt-consult.com> <fcd7505d-f21d-5504-a3fa-e87ea222ac11@nostrum.com> <41d6f9eb-20a7-4547-859e-2eef5aedd3b2@network-heretics.com> <ae4c6d6f-ea2a-4abd-2772-e72d2e212c12@nostrum.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <47206033-cb7a-e9c1-d05a-32b600d68f65@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:26:30 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ae4c6d6f-ea2a-4abd-2772-e72d2e212c12@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9CJzE8LS1TebncgwSaCzJWpGURA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:26:35 -0000

On 11/17/20 5:23 PM, Adam Roach wrote:

> The secretariat will provide authenticated versions of drafts and RFCs 
> that include authenticated dates. For any ligation, I would definitely 
> use these in preference to any server-provided dates. 

IANAL, but I've had L clients who expressed a preference for server 
dates.   Anyway, I still maintain it's important to preserve dates, just 
so that there's less reason for suspicion that the documents themselves 
have been altered.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email