Re: Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP Service

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 25 November 2020 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B213A1F2F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:47:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ho1kvNr2H1yA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70BB93A1F2D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3D75C00BA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:47:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:47:35 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=/ghDX/9ahaD6m0daik/dkH43vYr9XJ1jJT+pUoMZC WA=; b=BwXhN6eeMoUlui/Kp9iBQUVC1+cPEu9M1TLpYvbnGKf1V3PorVH+eVe/M Uc5tyuD0N+LFyGdyZPjgnQbFahy3xWr96SaVQrIKGxUGO50BgL7VbjkKaiUz51es i5paB5PMWZv9SwmhCQUXoF/Y/XvNEInPLerBaNVfRWAouu/Swo2pAqSOeNuF4YQI XG6X55pov+CyTVYpj/WHGR4ccgdRBpkL/LXbZokY1N7yn9a+vYgls7Z5ChpEfkV+ 56g5e8JGsCUkrxDtk/6Y5FEo0qtXStAsMFzyrR+x8RM63YB4ep+UAyUnNrrI4MLN S3/a7L3IcMBPYDJsdGcH9yUpXdnAA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:B9--X37zsZnLg9spx4jLOEnFW6-iwZOTAKpOaxGG6QaNT9ub_JFhVw> <xme:B9--X878pVUxzHonOVLbTYYVnFmtsYURm8J4HA4Dv7dWuNzSLBbPREJxakffrX0pV v06vDFzuyFDIA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudehuddgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehhfeutdehfe fgfefghfekhefguefgieduueegjeekfeelleeuieffteefueduueenucfkphepuddtkedr vddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:B9--X-cPFkL0qoVAk1z5wsFUQ-GR4yoH6JqkY3kcTMmbU8ty27AwEA> <xmx:B9--X4K7hTXTO-Bt5guA5HzigPGtngHI3nWcWy5ZZIe3VCtBqxxWZA> <xmx:B9--X7Jmg8RPREFVP0Lt0i0wnk1LbSy4xrs7wc5jcZ7_1TiRmSUMeg> <xmx:B9--X2Zc--G-Nf9nNRdA1g1uL1LVfmkCjQJa5_hRwT3W_2iIcwIP7Q>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 27E243064AAF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:47:35 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP Service
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20201125205416.DBB742803056@ary.qy>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <2e2afd2e-7eaf-5758-ece6-c92df2608dbe@network-heretics.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:47:34 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201125205416.DBB742803056@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gcVMtrCFRfsGv6-B2jMfMk8F65s>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:47:38 -0000

On 11/25/20 3:54 PM, John Levine wrote:

> I don't care what OS you're running, but I do observe that rsync has
> been widely available for well over 20 years. Anything too old to run
> rsync strikes me as a corner case of a corner case.

I don't get this argument.   You have a tool that you find useful, 
great!   That's not an excuse to disrupt use of a tool that other people 
find useful.

Keith