IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Harassment, abuse, accountability. and IETF mailing lists

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Thu, 02 June 2022 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A62FC157B40 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=episteme.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oHTH6wvptRwk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from helm.helm.episteme.net (helm.helm.episteme.net [209.51.32.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E60DC157902 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=episteme.net; s=mail; t=1654207273; bh=iY/6rl1c0gyeC3OAGHB2aTlLwWxZYxzAEF7udW5NvmU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=WEc0ZqFfhlxoSjZB2QzW6S177zYhg4lr6gVw5BiilLFdjTg4sC2QU2r7VT+78WMjQ beGmvMNG9ff8THwedIVl/jcKCJPS7cgQOuK1G4Le1akMz0miXdKTI5oB7zC69AXCEQ HwBCZx87HiUDqrM9l+YeeY3X9AIMOuj7WJU5jD1w=
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Harassment, abuse, accountability. and IETF mailing lists
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 17:01:12 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5898)
Message-ID: <941D4EB9-8EDF-4612-AD55-251C381C09FB@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <6298831D.8030605@btconnect.com>
References: <16C5EC99A155D55344E1F195@PSB> <5a53fa11-8138-2261-0e30-ae603b064cc8@network-heretics.com> <452764b0-a758-874a-2ce5-122f9d0de763@gmail.com> <4520B31984B329BF6936113D@PSB> <6298831D.8030605@btconnect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4Io0wzGL--tUqO-6TeRx2bp4a4Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 22:01:19 -0000

On 2 Jun 2022, at 4:30, tom petch wrote:

> How about
>
> <list-name>-owner
>
> making it clear in future to those who take on that responsibility 
> that that is part of their responsibility?

Yes, but the email address and/or name of the human(s) on the other end 
of <list-name>-owner needs to be easily and publicly available.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email