Re: Bad/Good ideas and damage control by experienced participants

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Thu, 23 June 2022 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15F4C1A7F3D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 08:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.787
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.787 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 565Byc_lqpEJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 08:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5928EC184E68 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 08:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D547B4D95DD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 11:26:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fWKg-1uFs6dT for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 11:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.170] (pool-74-104-183-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [74.104.183.235]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3712CCC00D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 11:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Bad/Good ideas and damage control by experienced participants
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <d734b973-2d7c-95f2-0b34-162800180575@foobar.org> <C635EB0F-CF94-4AD3-8436-218A48F107DD@yahoo.co.uk> <9fd0dd16-e789-7546-0e69-e1864508f2bb@network-heretics.com> <fb2fc1f4-a137-652b-0fad-3c96ba5bfa5f@meetinghouse.net> <acf2152d-9da8-d7d3-a313-54970de8ac72@foobar.org> <CAMm+LwhnyU4WO5KcquotLcsj9XFwbf-MU+vFZXmwTmZUmHhr-A@mail.gmail.com> <62B2D362.70507@btconnect.com> <CAHBU6isKGjAVNFWUakm_NBmEkm9exyWFURGbnGdNofLMT0nAiQ@mail.gmail.com> <cfb3c081-b2af-3c9f-3cc3-4e72ebe1d8a8@meetinghouse.net> <27e8b572-a465-fb40-93da-d806b33210fb@network-heretics.com> <8c941ac5-95fd-3481-51dd-48031dda55e1@meetinghouse.net> <8a2a4cf4-f937-9886-5b7f-0508f98770bf@network-heretics.com>
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Message-ID: <ef6eb779-78d3-50cb-b9d8-92ef85cfeeab@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 11:26:18 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8a2a4cf4-f937-9886-5b7f-0508f98770bf@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/D-hzk7fyTQexcQ2q4gGGwoxA_gs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:27:06 -0000

Keith Moore wrote:
> On 6/22/22 15:45, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
>> All I'm saying is that better take people to task privately, not 
>> publicly - and FAR better than imposing "moderation" or expelling 
>> someone from a list.
> I agree with that much, except that it's nearly always a bad idea to 
> "take people to task".   That's almost never a constructive means of 
> feedback, especially in a forum like IETF which has consensus-making 
> as its explicit goal.
>>
>> Sometimes, a simple "Hey <your name>, That was a bit out-of-line.  
>> Perhaps people might take you more seriously, if you dial it back a 
>> bit" - is more than enough to rein someone in.
>
> Such feedback sounds really presumptuous and at least borderline 
> offensive.   It creates more heat than light.
>
> Instead, I recommend,"Hey, <your name>, I'm trying hard to understand 
> where you are coming from.  Do you think you could explain in a bit 
> more detail?"
>
I was thinking, specifically, of a list admin, or well respected person 
having a "side chat" with someone.  "Private social pressure" if you 
will.  It seems to work pretty well on some neighborhood lists I run - 
neighbors talking politics - in a Boston suburb known for it's political 
correctness.  I maintain a hands-off moderation policy - we're a public 
forum, if you don't like something, hit your delete key or call your 
lawyer - I want neither the headache, nor liabilities associated with 
active moderation.  But... we do have our issues - and one of my 
co-founders - a former city councilwoman - is known to have private side 
chats with people when things get out of hand.  Seems to work 
exceptionally well at toning things down.

Miles

-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.  .... Yogi Berra

Theory is when you know everything but nothing works.
Practice is when everything works but no one knows why.
In our lab, theory and practice are combined:
nothing works and no one knows why.  ... unknown