Re: Bad/Good ideas and damage control by experienced participants

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Wed, 22 June 2022 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967A7C13C689 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.764
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.764 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92Je3lVGtSOL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C93AC13C687 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E84CC037 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:24:34 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id s8+OPm++nObk for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:24:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.170] (pool-74-104-183-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [74.104.183.235]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37FF6CC02B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:24:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Bad/Good ideas and damage control by experienced participants
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <d734b973-2d7c-95f2-0b34-162800180575@foobar.org> <C635EB0F-CF94-4AD3-8436-218A48F107DD@yahoo.co.uk> <9fd0dd16-e789-7546-0e69-e1864508f2bb@network-heretics.com> <fb2fc1f4-a137-652b-0fad-3c96ba5bfa5f@meetinghouse.net> <acf2152d-9da8-d7d3-a313-54970de8ac72@foobar.org> <CAMm+LwhnyU4WO5KcquotLcsj9XFwbf-MU+vFZXmwTmZUmHhr-A@mail.gmail.com> <62B2D362.70507@btconnect.com> <CAHBU6isKGjAVNFWUakm_NBmEkm9exyWFURGbnGdNofLMT0nAiQ@mail.gmail.com> <cfb3c081-b2af-3c9f-3cc3-4e72ebe1d8a8@meetinghouse.net>
Message-ID: <1c8d27d8-e81d-f629-9cf5-bc676d9f826f@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:24:02 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cfb3c081-b2af-3c9f-3cc3-4e72ebe1d8a8@meetinghouse.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1A5A64C013782EDB2BFF20CD"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/r4-EoXv39QtFlTX9weLgWhEqsXU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 18:24:42 -0000

Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Tim Bray wrote:
>> The below from Tom Petch captures my opinion.  I have sympathy with 
>> more or less all the notes from all the factions in this discussion, 
>> which instantly stops when they say or imply “… and that’s why it’s 
>> OK to be rude.”  I just don’t think that’s ever OK in the context of 
>> an open-to-all mailing list representing the public face of something 
>> that claims to be a standards organization.  That includes when 
>> discouraging a dumb idea that is being proposed for the seventeenth time.
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 1:32 AM tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com 
>> <mailto:daedulus@btconnect.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I think that that exemplifies a universal truth that is often
>>     missed and
>>     is perhaps the core of this discussion.
>>
>>     First, criticise the behaviour never the person.
>>     Second, own it; not 'that is stupid' but 'I think that ...'
>>     ideally with
>>     logical reasons, never with emotional ones.
>>
>>     It took me a long time to realise how much nicer the world is when I
>>     remember this and, even now, I sometimes need to remind myself
>>     (as in
>>     opposing the adoption of an I-D which I am about to do). I would
>>     sacrifice all the spell-checkers in the world for a reasonableness
>>     checker along these lines.
>>
>
It does occur to me, though, that some places - like Quora - are just 
full of people who ask really dumb questions (including homework 
questions, without context).  We're starting to see things like that on 
LinkedIn, and they've long been the bane of various tech support email 
lists (along with developer lists).

Maybe it takes the periodic "RTFM," "go do your homework," and "how to 
ask good questions" ("come back when you can provide some details on 
what you tried") - to cut down on such stuff.  You know, backpressure.

Not to excuse obnoxious behavior, but sometimes it takes a modicum of 
brusqueness and/or snark to tamp down on the noise level.

Just a thought.

Miles


-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.  .... Yogi Berra

Theory is when you know everything but nothing works.
Practice is when everything works but no one knows why.
In our lab, theory and practice are combined:
nothing works and no one knows why.  ... unknown