Re: Bad/Good ideas and damage control by experienced participants

Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> Wed, 15 June 2022 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515AAC15AAD5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.786
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.786 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qFfwDXqvNenQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.goatley.com (www.goatley.com [198.137.202.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B05C15AAF8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kitty.bergandi.net (cpe-76-176-14-122.san.res.rr.com [76.176.14.122]) by wwwlocal.goatley.com (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTP id <0RDJ0018ZB8787@wwwlocal.goatley.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:52:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [10.74.74.210] (kitty.dhcp.bergandi.net [10.0.42.19]) by kitty.bergandi.net (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTPSA id <0RDJ000I5B86B2@kitty.bergandi.net> for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net ([69.12.173.8] EXTERNAL) (EHLO [10.74.74.210]) with TLS/SSL by kitty.bergandi.net ([10.0.42.19]) (PreciseMail V3.3); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:52:55 -0700
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:52:54 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
Subject: Re: Bad/Good ideas and damage control by experienced participants
In-reply-to: <962ec243-78c9-fb54-1666-90b43b3b240c@foobar.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-id: <1cc2adda-f159-d658-a91e-a62658d916c6@lounge.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0
X-PMAS-SPF: SPF check skipped for authenticated session (recv=kitty.bergandi.net, send-ip=69.12.173.8)
X-PMAS-External-Auth: 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net [69.12.173.8] (EHLO [10.74.74.210])
References: <20220614144751.97882437791D@ary.local> <cf6d63e8-aebc-9c2a-1137-96c3d1c86570@gmail.com> <962ec243-78c9-fb54-1666-90b43b3b240c@foobar.org>
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V3.3 [220615a] (kitty.bergandi.net)
X-PMAS-Allowed: system rule (rule allow header:X-PMAS-External noexists)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/F45606d6v_beiGQ06MefN36ktzo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 19:52:59 -0000


On 6/15/22 5:37 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter wrote on 14/06/2022 23:37:
>> On 15-Jun-22 02:47, John Levine wrote:
>>> It appears that Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> said:
>>>> On the other hand, is it really a negative when someone is snarky 
>>>> with a
>>>> snot-nosed kid who doesn't appreciate being told that their "great new
>>>> idea" is a retread of something folks learned not to do decades ago?
>>>
>>> Depends.  If your goal is to make sure nobody new ever comes to the 
>>> IETF, sure, do that.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, if someone new goes to the effort to write up an 
>>> I-D and ask us
>>> to look at it, there are a lot better ways to see if you can 
>>> redirect their interest
>>> to something that might be useful.  Sometimes they may go off in a 
>>> sulk, but sometimes
>>> a little politeness and specific references to prior work they 
>>> should read about can
>>> go a long way.
>>
>> I think it is also a very effective sieve. Newcomers who respond 
>> positively
>> to this are much more likely to become genuine contributors than people
>> who won't listen and learn. The ones who don't listen are unlikely to
>> succeed anyway.
>
> Brian, John,
>
> thank you for speaking up for the values of courtesy and politeness.
>
> The freedom to be "snarky with a snot-nosed kid" also includes the 
> freedom not to be snarky

   Yes, of course it does. But that works both ways. The freedom to take 
personal offense
at criticism of one's ideas includes the freedom to not take personal 
offense at criticism
of one's ideas. So instead of walking away upset at "pissy greybeards" 
who didn't like an
idea consider that maybe, just maybe, they had a point even if it was 
articulated in a
terse manner that you're not used to hearing from your university advisor.

   So instead of trying to define (and curtail) "rudeness", why don't we 
try some real tolerance
all around: don't assume the worst in others and give people a break 
when you encounter
some behavior that irks you.

   Dan.

-- 
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius