Re: Bad/Good ideas and damage control by experienced participants

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Wed, 22 June 2022 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94691C14F726 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.765
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.765 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RZeaeNiWSaoP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2486C15E6DC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A811CC037 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:43:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yxYpiClhlOMq for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:43:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.170] (pool-74-104-183-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [74.104.183.235]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76CD8CC02B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:43:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Bad/Good ideas and damage control by experienced participants
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <d734b973-2d7c-95f2-0b34-162800180575@foobar.org> <C635EB0F-CF94-4AD3-8436-218A48F107DD@yahoo.co.uk> <9fd0dd16-e789-7546-0e69-e1864508f2bb@network-heretics.com> <fb2fc1f4-a137-652b-0fad-3c96ba5bfa5f@meetinghouse.net> <acf2152d-9da8-d7d3-a313-54970de8ac72@foobar.org> <CAMm+LwhnyU4WO5KcquotLcsj9XFwbf-MU+vFZXmwTmZUmHhr-A@mail.gmail.com> <62B2D362.70507@btconnect.com> <CAHBU6isKGjAVNFWUakm_NBmEkm9exyWFURGbnGdNofLMT0nAiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Message-ID: <cfb3c081-b2af-3c9f-3cc3-4e72ebe1d8a8@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:42:31 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6isKGjAVNFWUakm_NBmEkm9exyWFURGbnGdNofLMT0nAiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F5390AC08CE01F1A12EA75E4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vmX8hlwfJ7nFVKVrA0J0wE8qlTE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:43:30 -0000

Tim Bray wrote:
> The below from Tom Petch captures my opinion.  I have sympathy with 
> more or less all the notes from all the factions in this discussion, 
> which instantly stops when they say or imply “… and that’s why it’s OK 
> to be rude.”  I just don’t think that’s ever OK in the context of an 
> open-to-all mailing list representing the public face of something 
> that claims to be a standards organization.  That includes when 
> discouraging a dumb idea that is being proposed for the seventeenth time.
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 1:32 AM tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com 
> <mailto:daedulus@btconnect.com>> wrote:
>
>     I think that that exemplifies a universal truth that is often
>     missed and
>     is perhaps the core of this discussion.
>
>     First, criticise the behaviour never the person.
>     Second, own it; not 'that is stupid' but 'I think that ...'
>     ideally with
>     logical reasons, never with emotional ones.
>
>     It took me a long time to realise how much nicer the world is when I
>     remember this and, even now, I sometimes need to remind myself (as in
>     opposing the adoption of an I-D which I am about to do).  I would
>     sacrifice all the spell-checkers in the world for a reasonableness
>     checker along these lines.
>
Absolutely agreed.

What bugs me, though, is when folks complain loudly, vociferously, and 
.... rudely ... about some post or poster (whether criticizing the 
behavior or the person).  Particularly, when that complaint escalates to 
calls for moderation or expulsion.

And, even more so, when such complaints escalate to drown out actual, 
substantive discussion on the matter at hand.

How much more effective it would be if someone posted a periodic 
"netiquitte reminder," and maybe "how to ask good questions / craft 
substantive responses" post -- and then folks took rude people to task 
PRIVATELY.  100 private "you asshole" emails - or "you could do better" 
- might do a lot more for the cause, than those same 100 emails posted 
to the main list, and endless discussions like this one.  So what if a 
few rude comments slip by, it's a lot easier eyes & fingers to delete 
the occasional rude message, than to deal with 100s of messages about 
that one.

Miles Fidelman




-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.  .... Yogi Berra

Theory is when you know everything but nothing works.
Practice is when everything works but no one knows why.
In our lab, theory and practice are combined:
nothing works and no one knows why.  ... unknown