IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Harassment, abuse, accountability. and IETF mailing lists

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sat, 11 June 2022 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97908C14F727 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 16:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.804
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.804 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gl1cj_2tVOZ3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 16:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C3A5C14CF09 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 16:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DFB5C00E2; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 19:04:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 11 Jun 2022 19:04:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1654988640; x=1655075040; bh=M FVuf1G2IHA8KSjvY/VG3ZUk5fDaTWgG/tuP4OHxrjM=; b=wLbIp4Gi7+8KO2vFt YyHwibF4c9KNzfjjm6DML2kyPIcNn56tKhrh0hPneGn95fa0ZJPVc3/82t/RsDQq yINQ7SjLixnWTOWa3qLzw0tFsWp6/Z3LT6pBpbWBtuF0CY3G3O8EFTmXVE9QXZA8 zFypCPS2X0b6neVIjCOFc6iifpX0Q0DEfUfa+vbGaoTvoW63WUY+l/rLMS6BCBN7 ItnvCQnudhqzKahcw1nVhGBJR7QTqF0W1jcArFFAPXdxJ1j8RxvD8K3Jk2LXy8M8 73g50KaffjjXPTaWl8drDeOD5qNSVfC2+SOwbx52jeM4U1NWqGwFSbBbANqtv7kM +Tprw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:YB-lYrZgncUrNNormo2pAnB2OCfxHQUwmeEz6YXiSsI2gIqTN3UtqQ> <xme:YB-lYqbNo8ySsfz-vU3_c0XXo2jNGcoCczxH1GyaZDMUnDAHtquklhjWYusxavQ_V iEIggL_cSEI0w>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:YB-lYt8L6sz-uLEbEJXQ-OUbHDdENdt23oqxilFpxEEYeKwBYbSgi60ndwXOgRiObSumfbM_udUuJkElb2J3MhXjpywmYG9qW2qk1tFrRzNiS7hIs3sjxQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedruddugedguddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeftddvleeije evkeejhfeuudehveeihfejfedvgfduhfffhfduuddufeeggfetveenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorh hkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YB-lYhrUyB4jUV7LaQJeN2ra-vVJKdMa8bgQX8tHc26Y7825gnoOBg> <xmx:YB-lYmpvTdqPqAO5qLzdY9bkUu0PnJHPds0uHbknGaNGKmgSIZjcCA> <xmx:YB-lYnRIsKdAJ98IJ64Ky3lApPbYmiue7Hl6hI7V7Nc_mZusUQKtow> <xmx:YB-lYkHPmWBPZ_GTiPsSN3ZnLI7Eq-QoHKZUF3Sui_IMlhQPygJYcw>
Feedback-ID: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 19:04:00 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <8d6d5e69-560b-f351-a4e1-2b22995d952a@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 19:03:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: Harassment, abuse, accountability. and IETF mailing lists
Content-Language: en-US
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <16C5EC99A155D55344E1F195@PSB> <10863445C94B1C12A5973429@PSB> <A92F81D8-057D-4AA0-B94E-427D6F8AB53A@eggert.org> <55B5F6C1-B554-4675-BCD5-048043162D22@tzi.org> <65A1073F-8519-4BDB-B85C-72087B527498@eggert.org> <0325E09B-3B8D-47B5-83B8-ACA5A028B464@episteme.net> <629A3680.9010002@btconnect.com> <b97e7721-ae59-ab49-7f27-b427e2ef7bc6@gmail.com> <3A57F3D797B85E2F0A862687@PSB> <629B4ACB.8010308@btconnect.com> <A62BB706DDC6044CA7676E0B@PSB> <629DB8E5.7070206@btconnect.com> <a0556611-dc43-9280-1ab1-1ae747b21eff@network-heretics.com> <cba4c1b9-772f-8baa-d0fc-c94701747ec0@gmail.com> <C6E2D9FD91539FC17B7AD498@PSB> <8CD09EF0-A825-4539-9B3F-38B881BA4F2D@ietf.org> <6410e897-4a1a-35d7-9564-fe1b9445b2c5@network-heretics.com> <82ACFD06-E4C4-4DB5-A3DE-6543E41F8CB3@ietf.org> <2b247525-b651-1292-940e-fc98c2df84d0@network-heretics.com> <28b0e3d6-8f17-11f6-6d7a-f701adee0833@network-heretics.com> <5fd805da-1247-4b5c-dd0a-b7d577776ba4@joelhalpern.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <5fd805da-1247-4b5c-dd0a-b7d577776ba4@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aJrQxJx_x9Nxbk_ZRPB-Vi0Xieo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 23:04:07 -0000

On 6/11/22 18:12, Joel Halpern wrote:

> If I am reading your email correctly, most of your concern is about 
> the vague definition and vague applicaiton of "rude".
>
> As far as I know, the terms of reference use terms like "personal 
> attack" and other descriptions which are much less vague.  We tend to 
> use "rude" as the shorthand for the discussions of the topic rather 
> than reciting the defintions and descriptions in the RFCs.
>
> Do you see the RFCs referring to "rude"?
>
I'm mostly responding to Jay here.   But the RFCs use derivatives of 
"[un]professional" which are equally problematic.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email