Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <[e-mail]>]

On 4 dec 2008, at 17:24, Scott Brim wrote:

> Some WGs are very good at resolving issues via mail.  Others -- and
> other issues -- just don't work that way.  We need to figure out how
> to make it possible for more issues to be resolved in more WGs before
> without having to get together in person.  We've done this several
> times in the past but now we *must* take the next step, we have no
> choice.

We don't?

> There are audio conference tools

Yes, all the tediousness of listening to people with hard to  
understand accents or idiom at times you're normally asleep without  
getting to enjoy the airline food... I don't think this works for  
large groups.

The trouble is that it's often hard to get feedback on something  
without presenting it in a meeting. If we could get some incentives  
happening for reviewing other people's work, we wouldn't have to  
present all this stuff.

For instance: some kind of official recognition that can go on a CV or  
something. Or review swapping: review three drafts and we'll get two  
quality reviews for yours, with some kind of reputation system for  
review quality.
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees