Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 03 December 2008 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AFA3A6A04; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:11:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5A43A6923 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:11:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IsOz-52WzvgD for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1125A3A6822 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2431119fga.41 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:11:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language :message-id; bh=JMbr+buxInux8ba0H4VFKUQMri1uYH9q3kthmTwhv88=; b=t9Q+i9auT8XbrQuJVomQ8791ukKZzk6VisJMbxebY2MpeIpaA1XngH1QoCox97nU44 zOgj4gpiSBkAKOhUJft4lcJcu7tcHuJ4MqUCva+5wu3PDnxHZ0JF/1mxur7mj8CsOxx0 GpNUETO9/pDFE0uv3SIvMRfVMe2jB2DPM3AUM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language:message-id; b=joKUIhCCCQSu75lYesOWoyharznVVZrQFF38AZXIOuWieXJnT/sX6E8QBiQV9VJl87 52sEpS1YO0d+25h0GJeFNTvsVVnOV09WMYlZ/+hZf6VIfL5Eef6/q/Ivug2dYBJHNAeH 1cqr6hPjkkugQ8Nb+Erxcxyb9NZ3MfB5JvTaU=
Received: by 10.86.84.18 with SMTP id h18mr8024512fgb.22.1228317060955; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windows8d787f9 (bzq-79-178-114-9.red.bezeqint.net [79.178.114.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm4492647fgg.23.2008.12.03.07.10.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:10:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: 'Blaine Cook' <romeda@gmail.com>, 73attendees@ietf.org
References: <1228249716.18126.28.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com> <88ac5c710812021300j111332e2ha48afd3ae731b3d1@mail.gmail.com> <d37b4b430812030545x59e12618y6e715e45a286a001@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d37b4b430812030545x59e12618y6e715e45a286a001@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:10:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
thread-index: AclVTXMt2d0O7ZVDSC2NAK2JiTRn1AAC5NRA
Content-Language: en-us
Message-ID: <4936a183.0c07560a.1801.349c@mx.google.com>
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

If you compare flight prices, you should also check the hotel prices. I
assume that SF hotels will be more expensive than Minneapolis so the overall
stay will be more expensive.

Roni 

-----Original Message-----
From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Blaine Cook
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:45 PM
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country

I'd assume that a bigger factor than visas in this case (just guessing
here) is cost --- $700 is an awful lot of money for people who (1) may
not be employed by corporations with big expense budgets, (2) already
paying upwards of $1000 to fly to the US, and (3) live in a country
where the exchange rate and average salary make paying for things in
USD very difficult.

The ability for the IETF to comp registration fees is unmentioned
during the registration process. As I'm new to the IETF and its
processes and goals, I'm not going to presume anything, but the centre
of this discussion seems to be trying to allow as many interested
attendees as possible to attend, and therefore might be relevant.

Unpaid registration in this case indicates a desire to attend, but an
inability (not necessarily due to visa issues). The only way to find
out why people didn't attend is to ask them.

San Francisco is vastly cheaper to fly to than Minneapolis for people
outside the US; some useful data might emerge from that. If it turns
out that cost is the major factor, then Canadian venues make little
sense, since it's often more expensive to fly to Canada than anywhere
in the US.

b.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dale,
>
> Actually, there is a noticeable difference between CN and others: If
> you sub-divide those 79 registrations according to who paid, you get
> the following breakdown:
>   Yes: 31  (39%)
>   No: 48  (61%)
>
> For contrast, the breakdown for the US is as follows:
>   Yes: 484 (91%)
>   No: 22 (4%)
>   Comp: 25 (4%)
>
> If you rank countries by the percentage of attendees that are unpaid,
> then most countries (50 of 66) have fewer than 10% unpaid.  The
> remaining 16 countries all have >50% unpaid; they are as follows:
> UG, TN, SN, PH, ID, GH, GG, DZ, DO, CI, AF, IN, CG, BD, CN, AR
> Of these, the leaders by far in GDP, population, and overall
> registration are CN and IN.
>
> Assuming that those who didn't pay were those unable to attend, these
> data could indicate a notable difference between these groups.  In
> addition, there may also be underreported problems for Indians as
> well.
>
> --Richard
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Dale Worley <dworley@nortel.com> wrote:
>> I've calculated these figures from the IETF web site:
>>
>>
>> Rank    Country         Registered      % of total              cum. %
>> of total
>>
>>  1      US              531             0.477948                0.477948
>>  2      JP              97              0.0873087               0.565257
>>  3      CN              79              0.0711071               0.636364
>>  4      DE              51              0.0459046               0.682268
>>  5      FR              39              0.0351035               0.717372
>>  6      GB              30              0.0270027               0.744374
>>  7      SE              29              0.0261026               0.770477
>>  8      CA              29              0.0261026               0.79658
>>  9      FI              28              0.0252025               0.821782
>> 10      KR              22              0.019802                0.841584
>> 11      NL              16              0.0144014               0.855986
>> 12      IT              16              0.0144014               0.870387
>> 13      IN              13              0.0117012               0.882088
>> 14      IL              12              0.0108011               0.892889
>> 15      AU              11              0.00990099              0.90279
>>
>> Taken from https://www.ietf.org/registration/attendance.py
>>
>>
>> 15 countries account for 90% of attendance (or rather, registration).
>>
>> Based on GDP, the US should have about 33% of attendance, so the
>> observed 47% is not too much above expectation.
>>
>> Seeing that China is 3rd on the list, with 7% of attendance, if there
>> are particular visa problems regarding China, some attention should be
>> paid to it.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 73attendees mailing list
>> 73attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>>
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees