Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country

"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 04 December 2008 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33323A6A8F; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AD53A6A83 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lj0J60igvzWe for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84ECD3A6A8F for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2777625fga.41 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:13:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=3Hh7ZDRzf6SVL0MC0vJiwj3WBBv0q0Vsit/fM4BZgAU=; b=cCPAZlZb1zDC2wk6iPoKfeLVRxbwovSd4WiR84gaMpBVjabUZhYky2PjdsEGcP672W RAQvxiP8xEdrTFVy7TQBe2vZwi7hIedmS4Pl9pocr99OVFtT8QuagCtE6hmzRUqaCBRD q2pca1BMwAUI1TtN3l3lehcf/TmOPwypLVxZ8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=XGu83d4RrmHAIi2grg78g1eaCXb1g3ZkVRR9xaSXQh9cPNGrxTqpGcuxLGxYZebjUW cdEfRIEIaOWnxg4Vnvo0BKAVN/sfcjM8+zZG64AnKUjNuBZyDNSZLhjZgWEFZYDCnm00 jApQTGtUuvUedRGlozc7S3shB7hnt81r6Da14=
Received: by 10.223.113.200 with SMTP id b8mr445383faq.84.1228407217943; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.121.7 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60812040813q77f45a0brc3e7cff2f76857cb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:13:37 -0500
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4937ff57.1438560a.1884.21d6@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1228249716.18126.28.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com> <89787CC9-F33A-48E0-A002-84BF24120969@muada.com> <F98FE19C-C10F-4F75-BCF1-06FE8CD7114F@fugue.com> <0256F54C-0DFD-48F4-852E-A22288C7CA92@softarmor.com> <CA6118EEDE3317F0DB4FDD48@10.0.1.14> <a123a5d60812031951i2955d955s529c9a7c49707012@mail.gmail.com> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE291800255A7BD@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <a123a5d60812040439g275ef327pc3807c01e74e2e76@mail.gmail.com> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE291800255A81E@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <4937ff57.1438560a.1884.21d6@mx.google.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0453146624=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Most Hotels have smaller meeting rooms as well as the main venue. If there
was an easy way to book a room for a small pre-meeting on the Sunday this
might become popular. Then folk can hold a pre-meeting for detailed
discussion and spec editing in advance of the main meeting. The main meeting
then processes the issues list where a need for more discussion is
identified.

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> I think that this list is very useful but the point that was made before is
> that we need the time to do the work.
>
>
>
> We can have a shorter meeting if we find a way to have all the sessions and
> enough time for some ad-hoc meetings during the IETF meeting to progress the
> work. As was pointed out some of the mentioned standard groups work longer
> hours and spend evening time on editing sessions (This is my experience from
> ITU-T SG-16 and MPEG).
>
> Personally, I have to stay till Saturday anyhow in most  cases. Having
> meeting on the US west coast makes it impossible for me to fly on Friday
> (have to take an early morning flight to the east coast) and I get home
> usually by Sunday afternoon due to time difference.  But if there is no
> efficient way to cover the same content in shorter time I accept it.
>
> Roni Even
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org]
> *On Behalf Of *DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 04, 2008 4:25 PM
> *To:* Phillip Hallam-Baker
>
> *Cc:* 73attendees@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
>
>
>
> We just to complete the story:
>
>
>
> 3GPP meetings regularly start at 9:00 on Monday morning and finish at 3:00,
> 4:00 or even 6:00 on Friday.
>
>
>
> ETSI TISPAN meetings work similar schedules.
>
>
>
> Haven't been to ITU-T for a long while, but when I used to attend SG11,
> they went on for 3 weeks at a time, and finished when the traslators went
> home on Friday, and sometimes continued after, so sometimes 5:00 or 6:00.
> Only relaxation on that one was that these were generally SG or WP
> plenaries, and therefore you could let some of the technical people go.
>
>
>
> But the main point I am really making is that the shorter you make the main
> meeting, the greater the need for face to face ad hocs inbetween, so you may
> save 1 nights expenses in the main meeting by gaining an extra night and a
> travel bill, and another travel round trip elsewhere in the year. Plus all
> the problems of trying to schedule it in my already crowded calendar.
>
>
>
> regards
>
>
>
> Keith
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Phillip Hallam-Baker [mailto:hallam@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:39 PM
> *To:* DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> *Cc:* John C Klensin; 73attendees@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
>
> IETF is the only standards body I work in that regularly schedules more
> than one Monday and Friday meeting a year.
>
> OASIS does not meet in plenary session. W3C only meets in plenary session
> once a year.
>
> OASIS and W3C WG chairs know that they cannot schedule F2F meetings for
> Mondays or Fridays, just does not happen. And I can't think of an
> international standards body that does. IEEE, ANSI, ETSI are all parochial,
> at least in theory. Two have a geographic descriptor in the title and the
> other decided to insert itself into US politics by lobbying Congress on
> immigration policy.
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:54 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <
> drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>
> And the chief problem with a light Friday, is that we have found it
> impossible to schedule WG ad hocs anytime from lunchtime on Thursday because
> people have decided they are going to start going home at that time.
>
>
>
> If you cancel Friday, then you might as well start about thinking about
> cancelling Thursday, etc.
>
>
>
> Oh by the way, can we now schedule 3 ad hocs a year so we can actually get
> the work done.
>
>
>
> And IETF is the only standards body I know of that seems to think the
> people need weekends off for those very special US participants. Many home
> locations of anyone outside NAR cannot make the connections to attend the
> Friday sessions and get home even on Saturday morning. And I finally got
> home from IETF last Thursday morning.
>
>
>
> regards
>
>
>
> Keith
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Phillip Hallam-Baker
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 04, 2008 3:51 AM
> *To:* John C Klensin
> *Cc:* 73attendees@ietf.org
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
>
>
>
> Either meet on Friday or start mid-day Monday.
>
> One weekend is acceptable home-wise. two weekends are not.
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:43 PM, John C Klensin <john+ietf@jck.com<john%2Bietf@jck.com>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> --On Wednesday, 03 December, 2008 14:42 -0600 Dean Willis
>
> <dean.willis@softarmor.com> wrote:
>
> >> I have to second Mary's disagreement on canceling Fridays.
> >> If there   are sessions on Friday for me I don't want to
> >> travel that day   anyway.  What's the hurry?
> >>
> >
> > Another $200 in travel costs (hotel and meals), opportunity of
> > >  $1,000 in billable time, plus an increased probability of
> > divorce costs for some attendees?
>
> Yep.  With small variations, that about covers it.
>
> Of course, if we also met Saturday and part of Sunday, that
> would guarantee Saturday night stays, which might help offset
> some of the travel costs (although not the hotel ones).    On
> the other hand, for those attendees for which it is relevant, it
> would probably further increase the divorce costs (or at least
> the divorce risk).
>
>        john
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>
>
>
>
> --
> Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime
> http://dotcrimemanifesto.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime
> http://dotcrimemanifesto.com
>
>


-- 
Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime
http://dotcrimemanifesto.com
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees