Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 04 December 2008 16:13 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33323A6A8F; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AD53A6A83 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lj0J60igvzWe for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84ECD3A6A8F for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2777625fga.41 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:13:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=3Hh7ZDRzf6SVL0MC0vJiwj3WBBv0q0Vsit/fM4BZgAU=; b=cCPAZlZb1zDC2wk6iPoKfeLVRxbwovSd4WiR84gaMpBVjabUZhYky2PjdsEGcP672W RAQvxiP8xEdrTFVy7TQBe2vZwi7hIedmS4Pl9pocr99OVFtT8QuagCtE6hmzRUqaCBRD q2pca1BMwAUI1TtN3l3lehcf/TmOPwypLVxZ8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=XGu83d4RrmHAIi2grg78g1eaCXb1g3ZkVRR9xaSXQh9cPNGrxTqpGcuxLGxYZebjUW cdEfRIEIaOWnxg4Vnvo0BKAVN/sfcjM8+zZG64AnKUjNuBZyDNSZLhjZgWEFZYDCnm00 jApQTGtUuvUedRGlozc7S3shB7hnt81r6Da14=
Received: by 10.223.113.200 with SMTP id b8mr445383faq.84.1228407217943; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.121.7 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60812040813q77f45a0brc3e7cff2f76857cb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:13:37 -0500
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4937ff57.1438560a.1884.21d6@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1228249716.18126.28.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com> <89787CC9-F33A-48E0-A002-84BF24120969@muada.com> <F98FE19C-C10F-4F75-BCF1-06FE8CD7114F@fugue.com> <0256F54C-0DFD-48F4-852E-A22288C7CA92@softarmor.com> <CA6118EEDE3317F0DB4FDD48@10.0.1.14> <a123a5d60812031951i2955d955s529c9a7c49707012@mail.gmail.com> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE291800255A7BD@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <a123a5d60812040439g275ef327pc3807c01e74e2e76@mail.gmail.com> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE291800255A81E@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <4937ff57.1438560a.1884.21d6@mx.google.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0453146624=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Most Hotels have smaller meeting rooms as well as the main venue. If there was an easy way to book a room for a small pre-meeting on the Sunday this might become popular. Then folk can hold a pre-meeting for detailed discussion and spec editing in advance of the main meeting. The main meeting then processes the issues list where a need for more discussion is identified. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think that this list is very useful but the point that was made before is > that we need the time to do the work. > > > > We can have a shorter meeting if we find a way to have all the sessions and > enough time for some ad-hoc meetings during the IETF meeting to progress the > work. As was pointed out some of the mentioned standard groups work longer > hours and spend evening time on editing sessions (This is my experience from > ITU-T SG-16 and MPEG). > > Personally, I have to stay till Saturday anyhow in most cases. Having > meeting on the US west coast makes it impossible for me to fly on Friday > (have to take an early morning flight to the east coast) and I get home > usually by Sunday afternoon due to time difference. But if there is no > efficient way to cover the same content in shorter time I accept it. > > Roni Even > > > > > > *From:* 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] > *On Behalf Of *DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > *Sent:* Thursday, December 04, 2008 4:25 PM > *To:* Phillip Hallam-Baker > > *Cc:* 73attendees@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country > > > > We just to complete the story: > > > > 3GPP meetings regularly start at 9:00 on Monday morning and finish at 3:00, > 4:00 or even 6:00 on Friday. > > > > ETSI TISPAN meetings work similar schedules. > > > > Haven't been to ITU-T for a long while, but when I used to attend SG11, > they went on for 3 weeks at a time, and finished when the traslators went > home on Friday, and sometimes continued after, so sometimes 5:00 or 6:00. > Only relaxation on that one was that these were generally SG or WP > plenaries, and therefore you could let some of the technical people go. > > > > But the main point I am really making is that the shorter you make the main > meeting, the greater the need for face to face ad hocs inbetween, so you may > save 1 nights expenses in the main meeting by gaining an extra night and a > travel bill, and another travel round trip elsewhere in the year. Plus all > the problems of trying to schedule it in my already crowded calendar. > > > > regards > > > > Keith > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Phillip Hallam-Baker [mailto:hallam@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:39 PM > *To:* DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > *Cc:* John C Klensin; 73attendees@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country > > IETF is the only standards body I work in that regularly schedules more > than one Monday and Friday meeting a year. > > OASIS does not meet in plenary session. W3C only meets in plenary session > once a year. > > OASIS and W3C WG chairs know that they cannot schedule F2F meetings for > Mondays or Fridays, just does not happen. And I can't think of an > international standards body that does. IEEE, ANSI, ETSI are all parochial, > at least in theory. Two have a geographic descriptor in the title and the > other decided to insert itself into US politics by lobbying Congress on > immigration policy. > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:54 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) < > drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > > And the chief problem with a light Friday, is that we have found it > impossible to schedule WG ad hocs anytime from lunchtime on Thursday because > people have decided they are going to start going home at that time. > > > > If you cancel Friday, then you might as well start about thinking about > cancelling Thursday, etc. > > > > Oh by the way, can we now schedule 3 ad hocs a year so we can actually get > the work done. > > > > And IETF is the only standards body I know of that seems to think the > people need weekends off for those very special US participants. Many home > locations of anyone outside NAR cannot make the connections to attend the > Friday sessions and get home even on Saturday morning. And I finally got > home from IETF last Thursday morning. > > > > regards > > > > Keith > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] > *On Behalf Of *Phillip Hallam-Baker > *Sent:* Thursday, December 04, 2008 3:51 AM > *To:* John C Klensin > *Cc:* 73attendees@ietf.org > > > *Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country > > > > Either meet on Friday or start mid-day Monday. > > One weekend is acceptable home-wise. two weekends are not. > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:43 PM, John C Klensin <john+ietf@jck.com<john%2Bietf@jck.com>> > wrote: > > > > --On Wednesday, 03 December, 2008 14:42 -0600 Dean Willis > > <dean.willis@softarmor.com> wrote: > > >> I have to second Mary's disagreement on canceling Fridays. > >> If there are sessions on Friday for me I don't want to > >> travel that day anyway. What's the hurry? > >> > > > > Another $200 in travel costs (hotel and meals), opportunity of > > > $1,000 in billable time, plus an increased probability of > > divorce costs for some attendees? > > Yep. With small variations, that about covers it. > > Of course, if we also met Saturday and part of Sunday, that > would guarantee Saturday night stays, which might help offset > some of the travel costs (although not the hotel ones). On > the other hand, for those attendees for which it is relevant, it > would probably further increase the divorce costs (or at least > the divorce risk). > > john > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > > > > > -- > Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime > http://dotcrimemanifesto.com > > > > > -- > Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime > http://dotcrimemanifesto.com > > -- Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime http://dotcrimemanifesto.com
_______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- [73attendees] Attendance by country Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Donald Eastlake
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Richard Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Blaine Cook
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Blaine Cook
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Blaine Cook
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Roni Even
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Lloyd Wood
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ben Campbell
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Roni Even
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country hallam
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Rosen, Brian
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Richard Shockey
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Rosen, Brian
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ben Campbell
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ray Pelletier
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Paul Russell
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Roni Even
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Andrew Allen
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Lloyd Wood
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Roni Even
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (was:… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Lloyd Wood
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Richard Shockey
- [73attendees] Better non-meeting progress, was Re… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Better non-meeting progress, wa… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country DRAGE, Keith (Keith)