IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country

"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 04 December 2008 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C703A68F6; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:53:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E103A6A64 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:53:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VmY8oSXZyGsY for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:53:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D34A3A67AB for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:52:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b11so2318009nfh.39 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:52:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=3ONv/4AoW7TH3HEJCFKIWjLhF0eRD10B0kg5fWEprL8=; b=prF5BNsfmOrm7P6qApc8OrOk7oG+xRUrbLpiefKtwSlAyKF1hheOPZ0/FcbQpA2Ebg cCMiADP0H3+b8iBsj1l+Ht0ngWH91re2i16j3Dssdtkie5/eX1IIssY7GVJg0C/UKr6Z //eouLCRkHfD4bZMuhs7yKQ63Vl39YZEPvzpM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=L0cVUgSU3zwaJxOhxgC+2dh7RoAB4K8RME85xGizX1L2/XLRn2UZEkKGmbHEtq7oWA abgokPO3hvJ/wmc7+rMRqXwrpj1H2gPjAeb1G0FRFOVpsvmI/eAwNlXs0+Ci1YnIfZGr 2pNJUSCaYiJGWaQhjVPetTM7CJn22Q/2aSdOQ=
Received: by 10.223.112.83 with SMTP id v19mr618351fap.66.1228420362205; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:52:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.121.7 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:52:42 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60812041152j25d20fe5rc5ac145bf25e8b9c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:52:42 -0500
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C55D9887.1787%mshore@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <18744.11091.630143.477735@sbrim-mbp.local> <C55D9887.1787%mshore@cisco.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0969751803=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Then support my position on the IETF list on Internet architecture, NAT and
multicast.

The only reason I care about the anti-NAT fetish is that the participants
have effectively blocked the deployment of open standards for video
conferencing. The only person-person video connection that is free and
accessible to any Internet user without a download larded up with cramware
is the new Google scheme. Everything else was simply not viable as it
required a technical expert at each end to get working at all.

Not that the Google Scheme is entirely satisfactory. It only works for about
ten minutes before the clients get out of sync and will not restart, but its
a beta. And if we had a real NAT story it would not be necessary for Google
to carry the packets.

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> wrote:

> On 12/4/08 2:11 PM, "Scott W Brim" <sbrim@cisco.com> wrote:
> > I would work on making the face-to-face meetings almost irrelevant.
>
> Hear, hear.
>
> Melinda
>
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>



-- 
Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime
http://dotcrimemanifesto.com

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email