Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 04 December 2008 19:21 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575693A6B01; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:21:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D713A6951 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:21:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PidRySKZLVrj for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:21:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1694F3A6B01 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:21:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2822967fga.41 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:20:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=AtnSmlTwm0xuvnAeu/RivUSYze5+u+vrzqUmslIneME=; b=JWDJxxw0vbvuqeRIEcmYtj789Bzp99swbhY4XvyH5VRauXRxzZp6f6NSsQ1tfyMwav 4gjtRAbphktqvJBReGithzgRfmUyH6BVn9cqV+1Ftxoex4DNqmC7t/R8fZdbNLG51oZ7 xqB2NcyLdvU+PeYO5plKNsoH4cwtSB5/dC3ac=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Qj+R2eufrpA94B3xmLZjxIZjicUABSi8z72+BmNL0IV2Ebyc9tOl7h5nOx64jEWESc spCMDSTkLpyp8F0iJ+L1qHPYKnHtpJusVIKbc4vX3MQJhviZdd2Zgn9uuzjUTzlOwj7G eOz6WxU+e8eKsSqRMdbaELkk9kcgOHg3NmeSI=
Received: by 10.223.112.202 with SMTP id x10mr585073fap.68.1228418455121; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:20:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.121.7 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:20:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60812041120q4e243267q470233cbcd992ad5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:20:54 -0500
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE291800255A8D1@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0016361e7d947b974e045d3cb4d6@google.com> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE291800255A8D1@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0929746048=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
It is still possible from the East Coast to travel from the US to Europe in the same day but it almost always requires a red-eye. West Coast was possible at some times before 9/11. If one is going to have to take a red eye then surely taking off Thursday night, arriving Friday morning (ish) and sleeping? On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:02 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) < drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > The statistics are fast approaching the point where an equal number of > the people who write drafts (i.e. the people who do the work) come from > Europe as opposed to North America. > > Show me any flight that leaves San Francisco at any time and gets to > anywhere in Europe on the same calendar day. There isn't one. Do the sums > and you will work out why. > > Point: People are continuing to argue that the meetings are in North > America and the participants come from North America and adopting timing > preferences to suite. If you are North American participant, start thinking > about your preferred meeting schedule if all the meetings were in Europe. > Living in Europe, I'd be quite happy with the current schedule and be able > to get to all the meetings with minimum impingement on weekends. > > I lose the best part of two weekends for every North American based IETF > meeting. I have no sympathy (and very little tolerance) for people > complaining about losing half a day. > > regards > > Keith > > ------------------------------ > *From:* hallam@gmail.com [mailto:hallam@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 04, 2008 6:27 PM > *To:* Mary Barnes; Phillip Hallam-Baker; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); > 73attendees@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: RE: [73attendees] Attendance by country > > Most of the single parent folk I know actually have an easier time of it > since they are sharing custody of the children with another party who is > anxious for as much contact with them as possible. Dumping the kids on the > ex for a week is usually an available option. > > Also the age of the children is rather significant as is the effect that > dad being away has on their behavior. > > I don't think that the IETF should be entirely indifferent to the personal > lives of participants as you appear to suggest. Most IETF participants can > find alternative jobs even in a down economy - although the crisis of the > past few months is something of an exception. But I really don't want to be > placing volunteers with a choice between participation and their job > unnecessarily. And I suspect that those of us who are full time corporate > representatives are a minority in any case. And even if that were not the > case, we are not recognized as such in IETF process. > > If we are going to argue for making meeting times on the assumption that > this is a job then we should carry that assumption over to other areas. If > we are going to continue to be a volunteer organization then we should > encourage widespread participation by chosing meeting times than minimize > impact on personal life as much as possible. It is not going to be possible > to satisfy everyone everytime. But I don't see why the fact that some people > are going to chose to travel on the weekend should oblige everyone else to. > Or the fact that you have to get up for a 6am flight in SFO to make it back > to Europe the same day argues for holding meetings on the Friday. > > On Dec 4, 2008 11:29am, Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com> wrote: > > > > Again, > > > > a YMMV issue. Having spent 14 years in a both parent's working household > > > (and now being in a single parent household), this is still not such a > > significant issue. In my experience, it's actually a bigger issue in a > household > > where the mother is a SAHM because they rarely get a break. And, yes, I > > know this is a controversial point. When I was at Telecom '99, which > required > > more than two full weekends away, the guys were fussing as > > the SAHM wives back home were complaining about all the > > family issues without the Dad home for support and they were really > > taken aback when I told them that the job that the moms were doing was > far more > > stressful than anything we were dealing with on a daily basis, > particularly > > when you consider most of us have opportunities of enjoying at least one > nice > > meal and we usually have someone that makes our beds daily, etc. There > is > > research that shows that the stress levels of mothers (determined by both > > > questionnaires and blood tests of hormones impacted by stress) is > equivalent to > > that of a soldier on the front lines of a war. > > -- Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime http://dotcrimemanifesto.com
_______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- [73attendees] Attendance by country Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Donald Eastlake
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Richard Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Blaine Cook
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Blaine Cook
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Blaine Cook
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Roni Even
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Lloyd Wood
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ben Campbell
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Roni Even
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country hallam
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Mary Barnes
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Rosen, Brian
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Richard Shockey
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Rosen, Brian
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ben Campbell
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Ray Pelletier
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Paul Russell
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Roni Even
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Andrew Allen
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Lloyd Wood
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Roni Even
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Marshall Eubanks
- [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (was:… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Lloyd Wood
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Meeting lengths and locations (… Richard Shockey
- [73attendees] Better non-meeting progress, was Re… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Better non-meeting progress, wa… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country DRAGE, Keith (Keith)