IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country

John C Klensin <john+ietf@jck.com> Thu, 04 December 2008 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EBC3A68BE; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:44:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA6D3A68BE for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:43:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HC-dn3RFb8rQ for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:43:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD45B3A688D for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:43:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1L8580-0003E3-1H; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:43:48 -0500
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:43:46 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john+ietf@jck.com>
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-ID: <CA6118EEDE3317F0DB4FDD48@[10.0.1.14]>
In-Reply-To: <0256F54C-0DFD-48F4-852E-A22288C7CA92@softarmor.com>
References: <1228249716.18126.28.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com> <88ac5c710812021300j111332e2ha48afd3ae731b3d1@mail.gmail.com> <d37b4b430812030545x59e12618y6e715e45a286a001@mail.gmail.com> <4936a183.0c07560a.1801.349c@mx.google.com> <48E57330-7D75-42A1-88DA-D5559304B606@iformata.com> <89787CC9-F33A-48E0-A002-84BF24120969@muada.com> <F98FE19C-C10F-4F75-BCF1-06FE8CD7114F@fugue.com> <0256F54C-0DFD-48F4-852E-A22288C7CA92@softarmor.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org


--On Wednesday, 03 December, 2008 14:42 -0600 Dean Willis
<dean.willis@softarmor.com> wrote:

>> I have to second Mary's disagreement on canceling Fridays.
>> If there   are sessions on Friday for me I don't want to
>> travel that day   anyway.  What's the hurry?
>> 
> 
> Another $200 in travel costs (hotel and meals), opportunity of
> >  $1,000 in billable time, plus an increased probability of
> divorce costs for some attendees?

Yep.  With small variations, that about covers it.

Of course, if we also met Saturday and part of Sunday, that
would guarantee Saturday night stays, which might help offset
some of the travel costs (although not the hotel ones).    On
the other hand, for those attendees for which it is relevant, it
would probably further increase the divorce costs (or at least
the divorce risk).

        john





_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email