Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country

[Marshall Eubanks <[e-mail]>]

On Dec 4, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:

> On 12/4/08 2:26 PM, "Dean Willis" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Sounds cool, but I haven't been able to follow a remote multiparty
>> meeting successfully for a long time.
>
> I've found that it's hit-and-miss.  I've attended maybe
> 2 IETF meetings in the last 3 years but done the rest
> remotely, and there are chairs who run very remote-friendly
> meetings and chairs who don't.

If you ever feel that I conducting a non-remote-friendly meeting,  
speak up. Services without use
or complaints may get slighted.

Regards
Marshall

>  (For that matter there
> are chairs who run very in-person-friendly meetings and
> ones who don't).  It can be done, and it *has* been
> done in the IETF.  Maybe we could have better slide-
> sharing tools or whiteboarding but I don't think it's
> necessary.  Anyway,
>
>> And frankly, judging consensus on-list is a lot tricker than in a
>> room. On-list, I seldom get more then 6 responses to even the most
>> critical poll. While one might question how many responses in a room
>> are "informed", it is still at least 3x higher.
>
> The canonical hippie-esque way to do "real" consensus
> decision-making doesn't require input from everybody
> in the room or on the mailing list.  In fact, to some
> extent it relies on individuals having the good
> judgment to sit out a decision if they aren't familiar
> with the issues, don't have a dog in the hunt, or
> even if they disagree but don't want to block progress.
>
> Melinda
>
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees