IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country

"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 04 December 2008 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302053A6989; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:09:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ABF3A6989 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:09:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMPGuF8cRmOn for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:09:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFFC3A684B for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:09:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id b39so4022456ugd.15 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:08:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=3eB87yVTp+PVNw7V0ap3Vaakx5hjsBs0t7Rc7g7y8PM=; b=ua4/TUjG6xr4G1tSKJMydJagtqy6cO6+6Mz9n189DDUOxC48YMtTDfX+MRXnW2niVe 49Mgqq6nEX5LqJe9w5Gkf428z9y4LfWaX4BQEieU60BCVCzcv6iZ/ATWrJWlx+uQZCKX bsSBMt5O/EhqJaPGEwZ53zuS4NF2uVsV9Nvjc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=GzZJQBTcoRuARIA/PmovxAE5Pfzp8yVIUqg4zxzFehQQifZK3VKkxxOGijmhhUOE5X 7Jy8WYdHXt+KwaNrDCY5OJM69sV7LVTlLQJEWH90xr0zHdSr3yEC7Ed6NRgo0PoJYGPD 8yQP2HxSmrvll0C9CyaQbrkw6st/wQGSsLCK8=
Received: by 10.223.106.68 with SMTP id w4mr442083fao.19.1228406938810; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.121.7 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60812040808n547a0303q303fd01f787b3fbc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:08:58 -0500
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C4E556C-F312-488E-8799-754047FA34E1@muada.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4936a183.0c07560a.1801.349c@mx.google.com> <CA6118EEDE3317F0DB4FDD48@10.0.1.14> <a123a5d60812031951i2955d955s529c9a7c49707012@mail.gmail.com> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE291800255A7BD@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <a123a5d60812040439g275ef327pc3807c01e74e2e76@mail.gmail.com> <979718DC-EFB8-4EB1-B0CC-71E547D54DBE@frobbit.se> <20081204133822.GC89638@cisco.com> <81965B9E-D8AD-4C66-9A79-16085260E875@iformata.com> <18743.64641.174311.815761@sbrim-mbp.local> <4C4E556C-F312-488E-8799-754047FA34E1@muada.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Attendance by country
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1772644070=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

That would actually be more acceptable for me. But I don't think that we
need to do that to all 1000 attendees.

In fact I would suggest that what is done is:

* The *only* Friday activity is the NOC teardown, no formal meetings of the
IAB, IESG or IAOC.
* WG meetings scheduled from Monday 9am thru Friday 8pm.
* Any lost IAB, IESG, IAOC meeting time is moved to Saturday and Sunday.
One side benefit of this is that it then frees up Friday morning for the
type of 'at convenience' ad-hoc meetings that you often want to set up with
four or five people before they catch their plane. It need not be lost
working time. If the combination of location and participants makes that
unattractive you schedule for Sunday.

Regular participants do not usually have to lose any weekends and I* members
only lose at worst one weekend.


On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>wrote:

> If traveling during the weekends is such a problem, then the solution is
> simple: rather than meet monday - friday, we can meet thursday - tuesday or
> something like that. Guaranteed to miss _one_ weekend but no more than that.
>
> However, that means more lost work time for people who have to fly more
> than a few hours, and people who _don't_ have to fly very long now miss a
> weekend at home that they would otherwise be able to salvage for the most
> part.
>
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>



-- 
Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime
http://dotcrimemanifesto.com

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email