Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous

Keith Moore <> Fri, 16 April 2021 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9755C3A35D8 for <>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXu_l0475Mjt for <>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 394713A35D7 for <>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal []) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB3A5C00D5 for <>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:22:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:22:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=7oFZWwzSk1EAVB4hw+EjwcO4RGSi/4bVR6Qnuz6vU 5Q=; b=Ee2lEEwkWUMl0N0nUKq0laWZYWg/O5tIQGYPcchJDJXYVxPlMYVVzAI4H Wzk+uBe6jzXZiiqUiVPxXfblrYMyB0D0+BenNUU9CsBej7dVZUu2qoFPuJufwVaF M37ajpp+3t4mmnNw5AuVU4R5gsPbBSSCP6dGaAYxqnn5yThfuA4TJSrti0XhexKL tdZpBFI7gNOkTjtB8Qu4jfF4WR6KjGBuQOjTscBupKqc/MHZyygPVGQlYPIyLVee QuZxYiLhkh7itNMkQYXvf8OgYxG8Mf6XZ+jd8e/MIk/6b1YBayc8C7CIuSfkR2/d pExjyxueKAdQF0R4q3+Zq54+Kc6JQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:tdh4YBUAyjjZ8ccPeMvxnOHJaoEjSqmfjMCnNt5cQ2G0nNZBksyfVw> <xme:tdh4YCRVIIJj8kNY1JZkjFRuztGT89Vwa7jvEAkBlP87jBmApe4yW-7yapqBWc_ig ipvIBt6MEZYng>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudelgedgfeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekvdeggfelue elkeeuhfffheeghffhkeeuvdduudeihfehudefffdtgfdtkeffgfenucfkphepvdefrddu vdegrddutddrudejtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:tdh4YLlsJ3EouuYGGl2pwKD4iiC0LJX5P3IkAOrM8uGvQ2HMXP3QEw> <xmx:tdh4YI7gUJSwpXwJL80O7ji6MKJyKdcWWRRrQTwsJ-nJ8y7RHG9cCA> <xmx:tdh4YBiM8WoM7hZOSPW_HjjDI612zC5ll0j4VY7Zooo9xCjHUrZC7w> <xmx:tth4YCxObgkeOAXaqOWumidMJ7zvTLmkHtEtd15WpD4rDczcVsyBLg>
Received: from [] ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 493F124005C for <>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:22:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
References: <20210414185927.07A6E72E4243@ary.qy> <> <> <> <> <>
From: Keith Moore <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:22:12 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:22:21 -0000

On 4/15/21 7:45 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:

> Maybe one thing that could be done is to have a set of things that 
> newbies can do to participate that are likely to be taken very favorably.

I've found that newcomers are much more likely to be taken favorably if 
they're well-prepared.

Unfortunately, this is difficult enough to do for a new working group, 
even more difficult for one that's been around for awhile.

If we'd like newcomers to be well-prepared to work in working groups, 
maybe the working group should put together a set of background info (at 
the start of the WG), and maintain a set of decisions already 
more-or-less taken and reasons why (though there might not actually be 
consensus on the reasons).

Maybe IETF meetings should have multiple sessions for each established 
WG - the first one a "catch up" session that presents and explains the 
work done to date, at which no decisions will be taken and which is 
optional for experienced attendees.