RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Fri, 16 April 2021 17:41 UTC
Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597233A2D8A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=att.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rs3HoLHBdK_0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF0CD3A2DD0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0083689.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0083689.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13GHYIrB031409; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:41:37 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0083689.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 37xu2pc2ed-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:41:36 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 13GHfZpi019380; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:41:36 -0400
Received: from zlp30483.vci.att.com (zlp30483.vci.att.com [135.47.91.189]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 13GHfV3s019288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:41:31 -0400
Received: from zlp30483.vci.att.com (zlp30483.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30483.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id A736E40145A4; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:41:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1AF.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [135.50.89.101]) by zlp30483.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 72B3C40145A3; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:41:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1DE.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.118) by GAALPA1MSGEX1AF.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.4; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:41:30 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGETA01.tmg.ad.att.com (144.160.249.126) by GAALPA1MSGEX1DE.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:41:30 -0400
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.169) by edgeal1.exch.att.com (144.160.249.126) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2242.4; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:41:00 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JSB/0gXjWSpPGALl0MdjC36lPjJIm8olVBukv9HM+Mvi4XLJEGVPGuv4pgpn5ObVFmuMrxyYx1g+xHcILH8rlfCbqROFkTP33bHFxpA9ZViYfATiOGyMwW4U6Zc9r9tmVWOooSIg7xNYO1qtXynkqHVXCxcpzbGf89uUGbv0iyi8sy6otK+Vyk6NK98PN/VXK8HyaJo2VGjjgEEo2LoIU59VG+Kj/ghDKlJBHoezu1+jGLLTpl4tHUkZUbK2gNv9NL7bOh3KsrVTfOEnzPcCz9ZdkSmRMnUFm+toM2vRvsXBhoM202KPUlAUhmf+Izw0webSqv2x73CIRISssq3ePA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mVThIxhRG7RZprUGnImhZjSRmLnDkiX7N1Cujtd1CNc=; b=EMd+YRwlHkkzMwARgOY0Y72wOgIjU+rOQ2DIxgu8mxTBPE5xchJMmb12x7FUs4Qvq2kp9jAMnX6HlQdK5jJbxn+pvYLnaIK6y/R71frCU5vtfZ7BOV1Ew2nNeEWlHJ3LPdiRrjye9uwPpL1ZaAkviZpGlx+d9W/vcg+sscieKRAQ7J869LIEkL9fpqiSgSQHQ34TLISUegJxWfdygy+x4x1hKk7+M2ft21ikhVJJKiHLM2KKsC6lcltM/TpddDbg+zyVLaOHnG/uTFXslTFEEYiaz3dzahLcxZuQHBmMmdELsbUw80d/Wq/RlZCm/4uhNd7TPVnpmVhhZjd6QkBmFw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=att.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=att.com; dkim=pass header.d=att.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-att-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mVThIxhRG7RZprUGnImhZjSRmLnDkiX7N1Cujtd1CNc=; b=efWnzQ9meuL9JqqB1T2ffWqRMJYJqEG8ZmRVg4HQtpdnxCHs17oBk7VdkXhJQ8bAGPAyAatQymTIbBb/Yn44ehYo1w8iaQiaP8hKbMMD+frXEeRrl48MMls2bbEHW46/hVyuq7jl6hIjaxcdAoEzfhdU053mJNhTE8mgqxpTyFw=
Received: from DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:25f::7) by DM6PR02MB6954.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:22d::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4042.18; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:40:51 +0000
Received: from DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d09:83cc:18fe:ab1d]) by DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d09:83cc:18fe:ab1d%9]) with mapi id 15.20.4042.019; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:40:51 +0000
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: 'Michael Thomas' <mike@mtcc.com>, "'ietf@ietf.org'" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
Thread-Topic: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
Thread-Index: AQHXMWBnYxofiIIh60SrW1vmjZXcEqq0lumAgAEHWACAAJNnAIAAAgwAgAAMYwCAAAo/AIAABCIAgAAE5gCAAAInAIAAATqAgAADeACAAQ/rgA==
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:40:51 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR02MB6924642567FFFF00102872EBC34C9@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20210414185927.07A6E72E4243@ary.qy> <8ae469dd-a94e-73b5-412c-7f08730fc5e2@petit-huguenin.org> <25A6DF1D-5772-4DB9-8E0B-C549157DF666@akamai.com> <CAHw9_iKcacK-gsmL9P_yBuyeGYnB44j1=TxF=VnG3Uu65JKJcQ@mail.gmail.com> <10C5497B-FCC3-45BE-B6A7-EE3A1C1D6883@akamai.com> <f02a58f3-ff79-3f3f-fc31-7aa17f7d14aa@mtcc.com> <698cf4f7-de67-8efb-a944-b29da42dca31@network-heretics.com> <dc7ff33f-a007-7afe-7d1b-92a242b7c799@mtcc.com> <aaebce66-6318-dc16-b8b0-5a7d7e3361a3@network-heretics.com> <6f709190-7f44-906b-a36b-90a8a4d73153@mtcc.com> <1b9fd5ac-5ef6-0114-4a2e-96e7a53aa665@network-heretics.com> <cec30d23-6d88-9de9-c606-b6cc2bbeb922@mtcc.com>
In-Reply-To: <cec30d23-6d88-9de9-c606-b6cc2bbeb922@mtcc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: mtcc.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mtcc.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=att.com;
x-originating-ip: [45.18.123.63]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 58881274-c8ac-438d-211b-08d900fec749
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR02MB6954:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR02MB695462933E6DF3F66BE25AF2C34C9@DM6PR02MB6954.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(8676002)(8936002)(186003)(26005)(2906002)(38100700002)(33656002)(71200400001)(66446008)(64756008)(76116006)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(5660300002)(52536014)(82202003)(86362001)(55016002)(83380400001)(316002)(110136005)(122000001)(6506007)(478600001)(7696005)(9686003)(491001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 58881274-c8ac-438d-211b-08d900fec749
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Apr 2021 17:40:51.3891 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: e741d71c-c6b6-47b0-803c-0f3b32b07556
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: qzRCkevE23wghMWKFaM5qaw3AyXVsmVUcJtBevmBVtUjj1gz8tLa/x8iGwxN36L+
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR02MB6954
X-OriginatorOrg: att.com
X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: D49E4DE83BBF014E26263A3E201A50862C06424DADE5DF2100ACC09EAF2F6F692
X-Proofpoint-GUID: PDEwz7YSTtc18H02H9VDYHpd6-MM1_ga
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: PDEwz7YSTtc18H02H9VDYHpd6-MM1_ga
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-16_08:2021-04-16, 2021-04-16 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=812 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2104160124
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/a_sauMMc344yyC4VEzBcRCPBkGI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:41:43 -0000
> >> I remember when I first arrived on the scene and all I can say is > >> that I was really cringeworthy. I'm pretty confident so I could take > >> my lumps, but most people are much more risk adverse. We need to keep > >> that in mind. > > > > I don't disagree, but if we make it easier for new participants to get > > up to speed, there will be a lot less need for cringeworthy moments. > > And WGs might also become more productive. I'm not really replying to this directly, but more to the thought it made me have. What if we have a "WG mentor(s)" in each WG? This could be chairs, but doesn't have to be. It's something I see some chairs do, but far from all. One role would be "if you want to post something to this WG but don't feel comfortable, feel free to reach out to this person and ask". Then this person could provide some private feedback and maybe any history that the post would be coming up against. The WG mentor could also help set the tone of the initial response to a new person. If a new person posts something without contacting the mentor first and immediately gets laid into, the mentor could reach out and provide some private constructive feedback and encouragement. Anyway, it's just a thought about something that could be experimented with and doesn't require money or massive change. Y'all have a great weekend. Barbara
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… John Levine
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Salz, Rich
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Eliot Lear
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Salz, Rich
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Jim Fenton
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Salz, Rich
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Nico Williams
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Nico Williams
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… John Levine
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Christian Huitema
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Livingood, Jason
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Dan Harkins
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Nico Williams
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Colin Perkins
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… tom petch
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… John R Levine
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fellowshi… Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Leif Johansson
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Warren Kumari
- RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael McBride
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Wes Hardaker
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… scott
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Keith Moore
- New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program) Andrew Sullivan
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… John C Klensin
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Fernando Gont
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Brian Carpenter
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… S Moonesamy
- Re: motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fello… Lars Eggert
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… tom petch
- RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Ofer Inbar
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Warren Kumari
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Mary B
- RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… John C Klensin
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… S Moonesamy
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Michael Thomas
- RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Larry Masinter
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… John C Klensin
- RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Larry Masinter
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Michael Thomas
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Michael Richardson
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Michael Thomas
- What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-c… Keith Moore
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: N… lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: N… Keith Moore
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Ofer Inbar
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: N… Leif Johansson
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Dave Cridland
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Christian Huitema
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Salz, Rich
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Clint Chaplin
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Salz, Rich
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Randy Presuhn
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Michael Thomas
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Michael Thomas
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Ofer Inbar
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Randy Presuhn
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Michael Thomas
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Richard Shockey
- adapting IETF in light of github and similar tool… Keith Moore
- RE: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Larry Masinter
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Richard Shockey
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Lloyd W
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Dave Cridland
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Lloyd W
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Keith Moore
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … John Levine
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Salz, Rich
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Nick Hilliard
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Keith Moore
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Eliot Lear
- RE: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Larry Masinter
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Fred Baker
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Jay Daley
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Jay Daley
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Lloyd W
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Jay Daley
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Nick Hilliard