Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous

Michael Thomas <> Fri, 16 April 2021 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB4C3A367D for <>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KE7Qu8Dxxyki for <>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311213A367B for <>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id u14-20020a17090a1f0eb029014e38011b09so8825779pja.5 for <>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=BnJekZsLYz8YLrHecbbLTmbd6LF/lCoZ5/5AMc8zmr8=; b=GfYtQY5D6tPEh8+Hcx7uDLNDunsgFt2ytPpCmQZHMj5+zRjcFvcApefE4DScheTi53 EG0JpGe3Jz3kPAXXYizjwDd7DilusZ2lLWzFXHEuq6gdtS1s41cuAzK6MalnbkwPrrvV M3TJiTr5VZPTrxus/hnyRrI2rzGCRXzpVOKV/KTyxvQcQ3CwfB4dJEfVugwimxOszVRu Q5BZTMwl9JTuNki8ihwFOmFkihxAu1UkAwEhrSGwzTyalndStg2LlqGdUlwzpvzO6q0u FK/j7c5vAvLFlEOPWRejPYqn0dWcigeL3f2J6/fb1kn3E/bsAr5BFXohYI2JYtpaUnyO Tj8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=BnJekZsLYz8YLrHecbbLTmbd6LF/lCoZ5/5AMc8zmr8=; b=hoplqWRWK2O/IG5gJ1WbCvUixXq0JLWb8NwIJpKF3jVb0k9Imwm3JjO7rDOjwVUKXy OUEp2dwZcru3DlgVLmJnoIjNANr7eDUVovDX/HF8+ZscH3QXThQ3RkDQ4oLwQuXsQ2fu sq82HzK/uGpKIzIm989o4WmZYaUw1OD3NrTIvQpC3w/Hf+dBxI2cGwMuSRnuEhteSvF3 1YF0fTH+35e8cSmW8iMaCHYs0YnUGXMBsod21RaSlYvJILCFC9xe4qKwpjO5V0ky6stI 6vdydocZVRkOYh0eCxS5SXCO5FYHPnvDvTJfQ48oIo/p9LZCm2+n8p+gwleYCDWvSp93 7XZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fgloRz1MAgvntuRXU73bswmCdQ1/pqQnNhmW2X1NksUpQzEwN WmcoBB3Tx4yDYaAIWqGeo9aueXkYyGQBPA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx04ob1viQ4jLm46cC7+IkkLV3pIiMNykqw9GOQp4AkefVEt2TIpF3Wr/HE3hEESLpbi3AATQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3656:: with SMTP id nh22mr6359238pjb.112.1618533932086; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mike-mac.lan ( []) by with ESMTPSA id t15sm3238968pgh.33.2021. (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
To: Wes Hardaker <>
References: <20210414185927.07A6E72E4243@ary.qy> <> <> <> <> <> <>
From: Michael Thomas <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:45:30 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:45:38 -0000

On 4/15/21 5:22 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> Michael Thomas <> writes:
>> Maybe one thing that could be done is to have a set of things that
>> newbies can do to participate that are likely to be taken very
>> favorably. What author doesn't like somebody who's gone through your
>> ID with a fine tooth comb for nits, bad grammar, unclear text, etc and
>> especially from fresh eyes from the perspective of a potential
>> implementer, for example. Everybody would win in that situation. Their
>> naivety is a huge benefit.
> As a guide(s) I've (we've) mentioned this specific helpful task to
> newcomers.  However, reviewing documents is sort of "boring" task to
> many I'm sure.  What I've (we've?) failed to do is also state "and by
> doing this your name will be put in the acknowledgements section", which
> honestly might help motivate some.  Maybe.
Yes, it's boring but it does need to get done. And it's exactly the kind 
of thing that fresh eyes can provide. Far too many working groups are 
completely blind as to how bad/underspecified their specs are. My 
favorite whipping boy, STIR, is a prime example. When confronted with it 
by multiple people, it got snarls and resentment. That is when then 
wheels have truly come off. If you want newbies to feel welcome, that is 
the exact wrong thing that should happen. But when you're first starting 
out, an acknowledgement is definitely an incentive.