Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?

Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> Mon, 19 April 2021 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3F93A2783 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.654
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=shockey.us
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id euKbkt3UrXjh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway20.websitewelcome.com (gateway20.websitewelcome.com [192.185.46.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF053A4536 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm17.websitewelcome.com (cm17.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.20]) by gateway20.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD1B40110065 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:25:53 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from box5527.bluehost.com ([162.241.218.19]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id YbXel0LB0MGeEYbXelOd6J; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:34:50 -0500
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type:Mime-version:In-Reply-To :References:Message-ID:CC:To:From:Subject:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PjNyQScWMHueaG64MFeK8TclTsVTgrkjyinkxaqC1rI=; b=k2zRBa+Jkobl9JGRaVUYKRbBLq qcslbrI2nl7USj3LQCcBy7ChNO/zSQNQCYovuHNRWsY54cP5F+MDkaVoIyJ4U6LCHSKr2WBBQxNTp Uqa84Tf8lFDZa4D6XYiaJqm2m;
Received: from pool-100-36-18-145.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.36.18.145]:58342 helo=[192.168.1.156]) by box5527.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1lYbXd-001Nb0-RU; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:34:49 -0600
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.48.21041102
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:34:48 -0400
Subject: Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
CC: <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <EE6AD028-C5E9-4FA9-9756-0ACB32E298F9@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
References: <0b63d094-8c95-409f-282e-86231128f7b5@network-heretics.com> <1C5B7B67-27E5-41F5-89D4-765A407C1FC6@mnt.se>
In-Reply-To: <1C5B7B67-27E5-41F5-89D4-765A407C1FC6@mnt.se>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5527.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - shockey.us
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.36.18.145
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1lYbXd-001Nb0-RU
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-36-18-145.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([192.168.1.156]) [100.36.18.145]:58342
X-Source-Auth: richard+shockey.us
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: c2hvY2tleXU7c2hvY2tleXU7Ym94NTUyNy5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20=
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ifBr56ZjppivkpGNFrMiqg4y47w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:36:57 -0000



richard<at>shockey.us

Skype-Linkedin-Facebook –Twitter  rshockey101

PSTN +1 703-593-2683

 

On 4/19/21, 11:51 AM, "ietf on behalf of Leif Johansson" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of leifj@mnt.se> wrote:



    Skickat från min iPhone

    > 19 apr. 2021 kl. 17:25 skrev Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>om>:
    > 
    > On 4/19/21 11:16 AM, Leif Johansson wrote:
    > 
    >>> That way, they can learn to snarl like the rest of us :)
    >>> 
    >>> Keith
    >> Or we assign tasks to old-timers so they can learn not to.
    > 
    > In other words, they can spend all of their time politely explaining in detail why proposals are Bad Ideas, instead of getting useful work done.

    Point to where the useful work will be done if we don’t stop this.

RS> GitHub.  The paradigm has shifted. It's no longer "rough consensus and running code." Its just running code.  Look at WEBRTC as a example.