Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 15 April 2021 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA863A213B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nEtpzC_bgd4i for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 447013A213A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13FE2AeL029394; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:06:21 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=B6y/oba/lns/YMhTFNJcr1f9ButWqdf852jVe8wL/t4=; b=gscfKkxm5PmzVetHgX99bYiErZvZX3W2FII+tT8Pmow1Dq9GKQiJMNYu63t7vmImPbj6 DHHXpuUk6Usod3xHWA04sqGYYzNnFMVFuxJlzS5alBbc0iSqN4xKSJxteEpo5jMmt3q5 X/6F5pkDEuojy1ApYZmn1dNfIdKFQkq2edMi2VLN1uLbup/WZeJ9pZILyFijSElM/W9O dZd0dlzfp/WwCCQhiw6XRw+WIUnwl24mGYdAA8RhiWuz1S8PxsbGobKt7BLaAuZO0rxy aCVAMVrJc/hSgxN3T7LbWH9HKmOS4L/egl9ShHkfYYADjs28XEF2v346Pscl+CMNQRw5 9g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (a72-247-45-34.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.34] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 37xe7hw98y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:06:21 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13FDoQHU023180; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:06:20 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.112]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 37wvb3h2dq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:06:20 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:06:19 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.012; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:06:19 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
Thread-Topic: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
Thread-Index: AQHXMWBbvyhk+Q+LOka4HiXr8Y8Msaq02feAgADVDgA=
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:06:18 +0000
Message-ID: <25A6DF1D-5772-4DB9-8E0B-C549157DF666@akamai.com>
References: <20210414185927.07A6E72E4243@ary.qy> <8ae469dd-a94e-73b5-412c-7f08730fc5e2@petit-huguenin.org>
In-Reply-To: <8ae469dd-a94e-73b5-412c-7f08730fc5e2@petit-huguenin.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.48.21041102
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E20C4414165DD14E900EE4EA5C4E3E23@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-15_05:2021-04-15, 2021-04-15 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2104150092
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 4p0KsPc5wQoaV7GlU8ztVjA8eFjzLLu3
X-Proofpoint-GUID: 4p0KsPc5wQoaV7GlU8ztVjA8eFjzLLu3
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-15_06:2021-04-15, 2021-04-15 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2104150093
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 72.247.45.34) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QGaCGD3HXr0cajnMj0Wrw2AjPS8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:06:29 -0000

>    I am more and more convinced that, instead on counting on some centralized way to attract new people and then get complaints when they do not stay, maybe there is a better way would permit to achieve our goal in a more distributed way.  I do not think that group mentorship for the IETF is working -- I tried at a previous company, and none of the mentorees are still participating, so that's not the way.

One idea I had, which I mentioned to Lars when we chatted after the Nomcom selections, was an "invite a friend" program. If you come to the IETF, and you "sponsor" a colleague, then they get reduced/free admission. Of course, all sorts of details to be worked out there.  But I hoped it could encourage distributed diversity. Especially for junior engineers, you can keep travel and lodging costs low :)