Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Tue, 20 April 2021 06:27 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6363A1165 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QB6-9MMNEiiI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF9D3A1164 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id o5so9135243ljc.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7iDOWJIjSNg2RoPtU+Jgc3VSOV6/olOLNpOWQekMCtQ=; b=rthbwoYZLunsZNt54KpKV4rNWCprtc6kTpjnQ1zQiCVxlWM8qfSlQ29J5J7f2ex4nB CR/XWITG9eAmi85yz+6BApU79FniRHVNRVJxhQnMTYhctxnJJS03l0nfJrn4fiPZ4BbV qx2bt0JOnLFLbkCuylBxpZqnSmD9hTIs9LUy4iw/9WuP8VMleo8SHO+wgLu5dxSRGyvg HpDyzTfs3WjUb3T/ufkSIXa/Gqlge/+WFibwZHOFDwnyvm03DFq3MHGZ/uTWI8g9e7s3 sYIUCVDFlPxpM7DscKRh9oNjN3sYWQX6fd70xX4rmUGZSpIoj4scO57JDL1K5kOaMeaD 4NAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7iDOWJIjSNg2RoPtU+Jgc3VSOV6/olOLNpOWQekMCtQ=; b=rgP1dlkpEeOGkeq889nzqQ3G9eKTc586UbId+grjf+xKSZC1nmZeXODzl06kD2pjec nqkYQKyf9Dk560WujA0SrCFRhg/chDKLwPpTJibexQuYOGjYqKxKhB+pGaXRbNR/jjsO 3YkZZKs+qLp9mU9uDbzeLmaN9RrXTvhOlk0jPqpwFuq3lgAWU0EKrYaNn5X0Qh+pL3d8 PksO8s1rwmrOpiFxV+n5PUjNdM27nDhj20WfpQJSxLvA9m3BsTN1NU3LXHwR6urgyszY 0LAxXotYPv00OAAOpihi6AOz8o1R/KTnmccpfHHYrIDKOy+JhvYTC1agz7rqr93rrMeC NjjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533yo83NsmvYI/q47ttLh/cSiVUncg7L17+hc4f34JcTmw5bedYT I0pwV1dCQisFKrIIdXkmK0FzyLf2SomJAA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVSXv8iCM85T9vW6WmpxW3x9e+pGeT3EH8BAitxZuJ+nrJ05W68PUVyaTk2LY81mUPiv7+Xw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1071:: with SMTP id y17mr14404365ljm.496.1618900029454; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.173] (h-98-128-229-174.NA.cust.bahnhof.se. [98.128.229.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q15sm465052lfu.27.2021.04.19.23.27.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
References: <0b63d094-8c95-409f-282e-86231128f7b5@network-heretics.com> <1C5B7B67-27E5-41F5-89D4-765A407C1FC6@mnt.se> <EE6AD028-C5E9-4FA9-9756-0ACB32E298F9@shockey.us>
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Message-ID: <64b23154-a4ba-0dde-3396-07b3b0dddf79@mnt.se>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:27:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EE6AD028-C5E9-4FA9-9756-0ACB32E298F9@shockey.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OkzaSQyqV08I2L09uiE7eDMTVVo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 06:27:18 -0000

>     Point to where the useful work will be done if we don’t stop this.
> 
> RS> GitHub.  The paradigm has shifted. It's no longer "rough consensus and running code." Its just running code.  Look at WEBRTC as a example. 
> 

Thats exactly my point.

I really should have said "Point to where the useful work will be done in the IETF..."