Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds

Dean Bogdanovic <dean@voltanet.io> Mon, 28 March 2022 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dean@voltanet.io>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4553A122A for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 04:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=voltanet-io.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b_bpy8s2fhmX for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 04:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65A473A1224 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 04:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id kd21so8657253qvb.6 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 04:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=voltanet-io.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9QCCTVZ5GMOUfyZyrKG0R6zBlmC99pR6Nbz7Tv1jJlg=; b=n3UER7/Jg6cAMDIAAI5iXrYEQ6xb4Lzx56ZtZMeNhqft00s8/ouFrJQlpEX9sDCtAv 1L0Puqpmg4+2YyZixzgCPWlw0FtkS9ZTxMJjymm7EAj0Cy7ZZPnVy1FuYJmaLPvdZ3cj B1SW67q4TWcFH1+/2Gf2V84RzZswZdVzaEpdfGsmBYJ5sUXs5B9gHC68SF2vKh5zdX6s mAHyLORJd+3oiUH1AEDVfxqwOSEIFJsgQMlCHF+yQ3A9vwj2KPrP83q6PdSrVbiQV/hI gPoLs3FmMYrsWPRPr9Hi3gfGF8iL9lroQ+1plxWgxJ53aYiG45wdBJ1nKU/fNKyN/mXZ Ywlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9QCCTVZ5GMOUfyZyrKG0R6zBlmC99pR6Nbz7Tv1jJlg=; b=OnqsS3BY9I3W9AzecsvlgsD+Kl/wtHfm0kOf/0jTFLeXmpNP/WLv4iI+F/Sw9JuVnN 7lMKlw7VbcKFH34ZnFlA05I1jpqdYu0iwH490KLowqVnoPfjoHWVogzlYrUfuYtLrnK3 M1VVWlukzq64Xk8HODWQ7SNWW2kUFiii34KM4r64EntHBXonPcg/8NK+lEb61FWLCSbo mHrMjq9QDPE8eBnG3SH8GFnHlrUJ1v3nAZjNn3TMV+V46Nx9K+tbov2Cz0P3tb1++4O9 zxt2xkVPZcMfX+1WM46PvJjb6a1uNVMZS3RJG7lIwywxT9ZdoRdBGkpMHKwtupsi8BtS 9fNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304KzS1JnyKA50xkqmDUfyPW9DHyWI1+kG7Jd383uxIzx/1tsQh Ldm/BZL1Qdj9h95TpeFGnBLPSw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzupY+09UhLzudUgRIObkyxEMIzthH5aybyZ9yrf9HKczf0PLZd1mokziXvEzlsoekVZcKvig==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5848:0:b0:441:4092:c385 with SMTP id de8-20020ad45848000000b004414092c385mr20599085qvb.24.1648467906471; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 04:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.121] (209-6-128-112.s366.c3-0.bkl-cbr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcncustomer.com. [209.6.128.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d126-20020a37b484000000b0067e60283d08sm8034836qkf.40.2022.03.28.04.45.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 04:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dean Bogdanovic <dean@voltanet.io>
To: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, 113attendees@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 07:45:04 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <B6BA8104-CC5C-4201-81C3-606963A1759E@voltanet.io>
In-Reply-To: <a2a682dd-7f03-30a4-4d47-a6ffd64870ee@huawei.com>
References: <CAN40gStm5GUrqEOf-TwKEpitUUvBLDAvXC=asDVb-AxJ_bBq3Q@mail.gmail.com> <742B4ADD-593A-4722-B7ED-C24B107A1EA6@sunet.se> <a1d325f3-d246-e63f-1b93-0d97348a3063@cs.tcd.ie> <a2a682dd-7f03-30a4-4d47-a6ffd64870ee@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/-1DPz1R4-65WSGP2QAF67fHIn5I>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:45:11 -0000


On 28 Mar 2022, at 5:51, Benoit Claise wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> On 3/27/2022 10:39 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> On 25/03/2022 22:13, Leif Johansson wrote:
>>> its ironic that this point appears to have been somewhat lost in the
>>> thread: I do *not* believe that remote can replace onsite, I just
>>> believe we will be defeated by laziness if we’re not careful…. 
>>> Remote
>>> is comfortable, just not good for us.
>>
>> I agree. I thought the meeting went very well, given all the
>> factors involved. (So I don't agree with Leif's choice of
>> subject line.)
> +1
>
> Even we had a limited amount of people on side, I had a couple of very 
> interesting meetings that made it worth the trip.
> What I have witnessed with previous online meetings is that each 
> author cares mainly about his draft: basically presenting and pushing 
> his "stuff", without that much interaction about other draft 
> presentations. I also believe (no numbers to support this though) 
> that, during this period, less new drafts were submitted.
> With this first hybrid meeting, I found back the hackathon/hallway/bar 
> discussions, the ones that generate new innovations: new research, 
> future draft, and potential hackathon ideas. Granted, it really 
> depends if your "keys" people are physically present. However, having 
> less people on site helped me to spend more quality time with each 
> person, instead of rushing it

+1
IMO, the hybrid meeting was a success. The first day, there were some 
technical hiccups, but we got very fast around it. The WG chairs (if not 
present), found an in room coordinator that was able to bridge virtual 
and physical presence if needed. The side meetings and conversations 
were great and it was good to see many people in person on site, not 
just for work, but also socially. Because of work I started to follow 
new WG and having ability to ask few questions to get quick 
clarifications, is invaluable.

Dean

>
> Regards, Benoit
>
> -- 
> 113attendees mailing list
> 113attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees