Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
sburleig.sb@gmail.com Fri, 25 March 2022 18:07 UTC
Return-Path: <sburleig.sb@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED1E3A1135 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.893
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, GB_SUMOF=5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nf_w27tS8VT5 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97ADA3A1115 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id h19so6049375pfv.1 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=TUCZOOWfal8gGG3hPMFjrz1QiTaqDpG0ykmobGQ/Ig4=; b=Z2BM3tiWhADQorybTqCKJiXFkwn9Hl8R+YQ4MgtLlczVwMbZgtP85zKK87oOIiKPmY k2JcMaQsDQxZNYIOR1sL1ADjwk9GVvyaBD4hW7DZ6ElItD6mHKijvJvcZBLNQOocAQCo DH2DKP8ijNTy7Ras8G0+SmuhAgE/YiToZ/JFb0ztWgoQcxcoAfS0xLu55nf3WOEusmaC ezygn/riVeVdRLrsakylPVqHjBiPQ5nEM8df+x/tou2bt/Zz3pw/SEDlYsrqzzUD6XtH SvNt/L84EsGAKUD5z3ZlRpwg/WaGmW0OTRkjr/hgC1fms4J8EBOjcRSnR0WtZNxv21SM Vcvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=TUCZOOWfal8gGG3hPMFjrz1QiTaqDpG0ykmobGQ/Ig4=; b=ctkChHeafsf5cmPSaexeRaFoJ46q0/wzPJOg7XMOYA27woX0wdG2+cvlVWbtym5gzi 81CBlNgL31fXFhKvVSX8/at0WufhPAth3IcHp5yk+VhNIiy6l9v/y5v2LySGBP87d4k6 kAwZNb4ri9cGIO4Tf6bCvuTkLbufYS2PDErUJ43lvi2iKHZ1qj1/REeFkpb90grbFQk4 iTys5Innfge9+DLWQ8PWZKTiVcJjx/rMm/IwHyBr0Tjh0tWPNfG+lUXKb8ULIgHUud44 KAFiKzZu0etNHShlxfbVrG6tM39uh/UslXOzI1rowH7E1wO/HYz61WrlkwivmJ+4MgeG yvcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532QfFv4ihz0TB7itPtmm0WTB4qKJh2X5qjz3QMpjSl+FUBSyjUn SsbaTT7W39KRkQ46j3iS8LTV8Q5Sy3jEqg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzcMlz/4cKliJEJemT6kVr2EZeBDkgdnDEnwkbU5YGgZoi9aCEyE5RY+3AQ3VdRS4a9qtcOrw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:21c6:b0:4fa:914c:2c2b with SMTP id t6-20020a056a0021c600b004fa914c2c2bmr11377708pfj.56.1648231637139; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Nick (cpe-72-134-194-38.natsow.res.rr.com. [72.134.194.38]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15-20020a17090a168f00b001bf66741097sm6682264pja.16.2022.03.25.11.07.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: sburleig.sb@gmail.com
To: 'Mike Bishop' <mbishop@evequefou.be>, 'Jen Linkova' <furry13@gmail.com>, 'Leif Johansson' <leifj@sunet.se>
Cc: 113attendees@ietf.org, 'Wes Hardaker' <hardaker@isi.edu>
References: <91b2da16-46e1-2370-d0f9-786934637c09@sunet.se> <CANk3-ND6Hu5=fPskucoQKOCxAgwXBO9QuhQBoJBky8F5wOwemg@mail.gmail.com> <bcf800fc-2b89-1d9e-eaea-22432efdd4a8@sunet.se> <CAFU7BATNVKDY4xSrT5e-xbqLF98aaBs4yqhVFg-C5s5KG7-XTA@mail.gmail.com> <9f74a494-9e23-4267-8ca2-d7c8b1d3ef06@evequefou.be>
In-Reply-To: <9f74a494-9e23-4267-8ca2-d7c8b1d3ef06@evequefou.be>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:07:17 -0700
Message-ID: <02b301d84073$2a8add30$7fa09790$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02B4_01D84038.7E2EEB60"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQLKQypxZax21TFzgqb/xoL4Krtt6QGWHjZQAluUN5wBf/dIYAFUEBJjqrYyF/A=
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/MZ8TQMBponfWQ0F5J6R1jWjJiMc>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 18:07:23 -0000
Extremely well said. From: 113attendees <113attendees-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mike Bishop Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 11:03 AM To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>; Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Cc: 113attendees@ietf.org; Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu> Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds Indeed. The number of passionate disagreements that can be solved by "The four people who care are going to go have lunch, then present a consensus position at tomorrow's session" cannot be understated. In virtual land, the arguments stretch on for weeks or months. Sent from <http://www.9folders.com/> Nine _____ From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com <mailto:furry13@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 1:59 PM To: Leif Johansson Cc: 113attendees@ietf.org <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org> ; Wes Hardaker Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 3:36 PM Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se <mailto:leifj@sunet.se> > wrote: > I'm suggesting that there might come a time (soon probably) where there are no obstacles to travel > but the technology is "good enough" for remote *execpt* for all the reasons the IETF is more than > a set of WGs... > > At that point we should either give up on f2f entirely (and I think give up on the IETF as something > more than the I-Ds it produces) *OR* figure out another reason for people to want to travel. As my experience this week was completely different, I - rather selfishly, indeed - hope that your proposal wouldn't be implemented any time soon. In the last 5 days I managed to make more progress than in the last 2 years and I can't wait for Philadelphia already. IMHO IETF f2f meetings are a great example of holism, when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. It's not about presenting a draft during a WG session or having a meeting/drink with colleagues. It's also about having the latter right after the former - while energy and enthusiasm are still high. The sessions and presentations give us food for thoughts and discussions between sessions (so IMHO we shall have much longer breaks). For me there is another benefit of f2f meetings, even if not everyone is here. There are WGs which I'm actively participating in (well, at least I try..) - during the virtual meetings I was joining those sessions even if it was 2am my time. But there are many other sessions which I found very educational, and I did learn a lot this week by attending them. It's a completely different story for virtual IETFs though - I just can't afford attending everything I'm curious about.. To sum it up: I wish there were more people, but still this IETF is the best one for me since 2020. -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry -- 113attendees mailing list 113attendees@ietf.org <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees
- [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both… Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Jan-Frederik Rieckers
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Göran Selander
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Henk Birkholz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joris Baum
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Antoine FRESSANCOURT
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Jen Linkova
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Mike Bishop
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … sburleig.sb
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Azael Fernandez Alcantara
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … John Levine
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ira McDonald
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Bob Hinden
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … David Waite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re: hyb… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Yoav Nir
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Martin.Horneffer
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Yoav Nir
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Livingood, Jason
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Kyle Rose
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dan Romascanu
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Jay Daley
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Lars Eggert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Benoit Claise
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Tero Kivinen
- [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re: hyb… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Benson Muite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Douglass
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… David Waite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Pete Resnick