Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 25 March 2022 15:03 UTC
Return-Path: <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B093A14EE for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHiyMxfi36yW for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2577D3A14F0 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id j18so11253836wrd.6 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SHggvPBcaOaqPmSkpwKDWBbLwJaef7ARfZjjFWcrJqw=; b=VuGBOGMGz30UFYLCrHLIB3j+YGdR8GcQz6GFxg14jznmdx9rV+Sjb0VXxpKiA0m1HY hMbmlSxFyrsGX49o5YFIwtPyNP4lCkkebgYMcaHFVmN521k4va/KnaUXgzT8Mg9IZ231 qEWECDlx+3w72scu3QwGDzVqFmEQowN/RunnSxEyyOAD4yvhrMK7BVYAtu8h5HXok2W4 GVyPryQfftklqhm7RETX+jJDVknlFgxDF/zCl9DI8PtLbZ7+WDCsOYH7i4bQ5BGmnfz7 CZ2s4yiZnoHSyA3BiBk/OgPi8Jz8fwKljYY7bsDy349laT0xqm/4k4lxkw4apAnMm0yB VwBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SHggvPBcaOaqPmSkpwKDWBbLwJaef7ARfZjjFWcrJqw=; b=bOiK0NB2rjwc0VHECT4UDm+oMYuMFh3UvohQ8GlaSKAbK9Uw9SLHFMElf7G1WEku+E 1O5eU/hFWLutMZXr8UJ4fUf7s+I+8fcvGwd2yP1jXZFD+EEs1H/3GB7MVAHzq/Fv3jG2 ABdPmgyMQuT63gI4wINJ8xak4WQoQ/97VcV/aDecXcrNiZrb+AcAuX/avRzrDJ/nKCMR EOXf98iteXBBsBhU480f1EAOcMbgyRa22MzwERpAx5pq0EWoDVTEpkuF/hX2rOew7faA jdpJO9y5f0XoLC1mbITCOr2xhDiWg6W5geY3pvJQj8dmfIylkMEvFnXqI6+ZVcQsRUCO 4o8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+RGny60Dc/+JGzlgcAxeohdzEyMdNxu8hIt8z4HwKzsG/PPJm z+NLwDMGNQmmKRO0D+8cWqOZ00uuCLFpOpI+Tr4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzw/zxfulwY/azYb2TJIxfDQiVmZaYnIxWbpU6cHm7FeqRTi+fM9/+py6eCOS9HjNuLZrckYnLDZ+mEf0TzqPo=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e947:0:b0:205:9051:ab61 with SMTP id m7-20020adfe947000000b002059051ab61mr9502801wrn.510.1648220627559; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <91b2da16-46e1-2370-d0f9-786934637c09@sunet.se> <CANk3-ND6Hu5=fPskucoQKOCxAgwXBO9QuhQBoJBky8F5wOwemg@mail.gmail.com> <bcf800fc-2b89-1d9e-eaea-22432efdd4a8@sunet.se>
In-Reply-To: <bcf800fc-2b89-1d9e-eaea-22432efdd4a8@sunet.se>
From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:03:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CADNypP_0duKv+hmQ4cRsL2mSPMRDjB1SjUJJRncmuE5NhBz6DA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu>, 113attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000004699805db0c4540"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/gJHbOatjbJ0HiIYbhqqtzZ5oJqg>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:03:56 -0000
Leif, I had a very positive experience with the OAuth WG meetings. We had two official meetings and two side meetings. With the official meetings, most of the attendees were local, but we had good participation from remote attendees too. The side meeting allowed us to discuss other topics that resulted in making progress that was later presented during the second official meeting, Another topic was discussed and we have a plan on how to proceed from here. One random hallway chat with someone that noticed that I chair the OAuth WG and provided me with verbal feedback on his experience using OAuth. We discussed that briefly and I asked him if he is willing to share his thoughts with the WG. As a result, that person created a few slides that captured his feedback and presented these to the WG the next day during one of the side meetings. It would be really difficult to get even closer to what we achieved during this week if it was completely virtual. Regards, Rifaat On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 3:37 PM Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> wrote: > On 2022-03-25 15:17, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > Hi Leif, > > > > Thanks for the comprehensive review. I had some good and bad > experiences both, but in general think it worked "better than I was > expecting it to". > > > > One question, in order to figure out what a concrete suggestion I could > take away from your notes: > > > > > > Maybe the IETF needs to rehink the purpouse of onsite meetings. > > > > > > So in situations where most of the attendees can't attend in person due > to global issues out of our control, are you suggesting we don't hold > hybrid meetings? What do you think would be a good ratio > > of in-person to remote attendance that should be the barrier for > deciding whether or not to hold an on-site meeting? [we've had remote > participation for a long time of course, but the ratio was far > > lower] > > > > [note: I have no decision making ability in this area -- I'm just > curious] > > -- > > Wes Hardaker > > USC/ISI > > I'm suggesting that there might come a time (soon probably) where there > are no obstacles to travel > but the technology is "good enough" for remote *execpt* for all the > reasons the IETF is more than > a set of WGs... > > At that point we should either give up on f2f entirely (and I think give > up on the IETF as something > more than the I-Ds it produces) *OR* figure out another reason for people > to want to travel. > > Cheers Leif > > -- > 113attendees mailing list > 113attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees >
- [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both… Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Jan-Frederik Rieckers
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Göran Selander
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Henk Birkholz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joris Baum
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Antoine FRESSANCOURT
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Jen Linkova
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Mike Bishop
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … sburleig.sb
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Azael Fernandez Alcantara
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … John Levine
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ira McDonald
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Bob Hinden
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … David Waite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re: hyb… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Yoav Nir
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Martin.Horneffer
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Yoav Nir
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Livingood, Jason
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Kyle Rose
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dan Romascanu
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Jay Daley
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Lars Eggert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Benoit Claise
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Tero Kivinen
- [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re: hyb… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Benson Muite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Douglass
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… David Waite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Pete Resnick