Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 25 March 2022 21:08 UTC
Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6953A0B21 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9QE43f42wpR9 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55EC53A082D for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id o20-20020a9d7194000000b005cb20cf4f1bso6370197otj.7 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=UX/iBPkQmBdP6U3GnRysPRbdB9ka1q+yj7n3uLGWmIs=; b=C8kGcceY/UTZvXA+wBjXKFqHgWBxHN9vXIxbOT69E9xMwySJTpelAQAStzH6WP2Aso ApfEAF48SLUOYr9dBcYv9hCs3aDK/qs0sMNlVfEdE+yTlbck3RigsB/kL5wLrMEqKjT4 3I1L+G98JDQ0xxfsUeYy3nTpPNPQi8NZbx5cPOE5pgKiDDsoyszuAcm17L3LUhMO4w7R 7WCHT9zLh5eNRXP4f/rmqdjECb2HIgRZk5Pcapfy7uBajRmufuvlYuYsR/RcRfS75uHO xc1UazFK44PGPcpgZhzO3DhYQ/ACgCNgIXscqLCSpas9eeBKJ8g+0ghsNAhLOmVL62BO 18Dg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=UX/iBPkQmBdP6U3GnRysPRbdB9ka1q+yj7n3uLGWmIs=; b=ccYfcR+Y84mB/I4MziuirzcqfwVL+1JmAU4vDMTPbJdzThgMu/BRBYZWvpWvVkVVLD 4A3Gs2hVpF1vGwoOaL2Ugan5N5fYtWbFCQ6mYV5CyyPHTih9t6uo7jfZz0W3cyyWB25h 0vJVjsqHKSF801hrRxbLOeyXx6Bx2OroqoaJ/MERYBtU9JPe44W8arLe4ctiwWIIqc/4 bi4zWdQd3lUQxU/2u5tsbuDCu/X7sLtqQq28/7ehw7/iyiKBq/be9mlYa6oE52wNPGA4 qCE2etSvYWQ9ELc0IvbUnr+A0W4FsAWzixDLOaBvs+uQWMAV9JaK0VOU1wPZ6+7zG/NC Dv9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FGZUCKrAUM5S+RTiUyUKh+bbrMuf9DVYkgRyaekDwrZNyz5ji +8iRF1FVWSBAo9TzPFSGhPuuXw1N4xQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxW/vbdtFSAKLJ59bhfw4wjkEgFaRFS4m89NqjB7e2C/QC0Qtj+SzCx54gXwzg+xwDkzQAaYg==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6406:0:b0:5cd:c867:c2e2 with SMTP id h6-20020a9d6406000000b005cdc867c2e2mr1636667otl.306.1648242477045; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:1700:4383:c05f:44c2:7456:2663:f664]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l14-20020a4ac60e000000b002e0e75dcb82sm2924718ooq.12.2022.03.25.14.07.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AFE64B6C-2B54-4169-9057-E40E73F4505B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN40gStm5GUrqEOf-TwKEpitUUvBLDAvXC=asDVb-AxJ_bBq3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:07:55 -0700
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <24331BBE-D6F6-47C2-B71E-9947469B650E@gmail.com>
References: <91b2da16-46e1-2370-d0f9-786934637c09@sunet.se> <7e211098-141d-c3a1-7de8-79b7ba26aaba@labs.htt-consult.com> <10605.1648240211@dooku> <CAN40gStm5GUrqEOf-TwKEpitUUvBLDAvXC=asDVb-AxJ_bBq3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/18MgZxB_KcpE7qD5qIrGXjnLnDA>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 21:08:01 -0000
I don’t think the hybrid meeting was the worst of both worlds, that would have been no meeting at all. I didn’t travel to this meeting for several reasons, so instead I got to join in three 2am sessions. I can't say it was fun, but it did work. Had I been on site, I would have attended more sessions and had lots of side meetings, but that doesn’t work well given the time the meeting was for me (2am to 8:30am). I hope to travel to future meetings, but at least for now I think it’s going to be a while before we get back to the attendance that the IETF used to have onsite. I thought the hybrid meeting worked well. I actually liked the single queue for local and remote participants. I think it worked pretty well (except for some people having trouble getting into the queue with the mobile meetecho app). I suspect this will get better next time. Hopefully see you at IETF 114. Bob
- [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both… Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Jan-Frederik Rieckers
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Göran Selander
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Henk Birkholz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joris Baum
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Antoine FRESSANCOURT
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Jen Linkova
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Mike Bishop
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … sburleig.sb
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Azael Fernandez Alcantara
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … John Levine
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ira McDonald
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Bob Hinden
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … David Waite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re: hyb… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Yoav Nir
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Martin.Horneffer
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Yoav Nir
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Livingood, Jason
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Kyle Rose
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dan Romascanu
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Jay Daley
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Lars Eggert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Benoit Claise
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Tero Kivinen
- [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re: hyb… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Benson Muite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Douglass
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… David Waite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Pete Resnick