Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu> Fri, 25 March 2022 14:18 UTC
Return-Path: <hardaker@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50243A0CCB for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 07:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=isi.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqSFBQMBbvof for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85DEB3A1364 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com with SMTP id l128so8462996vsc.7 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isi.edu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=24WPJd6LUHfqcAjq+Te6HIxWWT/PrZgIjG+eJWZflsI=; b=kLbx7IQipapeCZw8kR8y6Z9c5FA6LvDiYHk6q7EmgQ5nqBir7cW+RbVlYmyWMoQocB 0Dv88QydbJqFMUudowd9pmvfksgEZ3KRbOyox08FUheN80XUIALO/aBvu7VGDcncM8b2 BO08IZ6iQXklOaCGaGuu2X6lrAR70pqFZvkFt05vvLkV7MN/JWwglEzAZV++j1K8QjTc tAY6o1Q/oIfrOYX2c3OJ2t95PT/+Kzae1gLWo/xQbolZtT/+JVmQwjccBPcWAz+2/sI6 upLBuhir8vLnHYDJK4mrodvK2EX9WepSZRp2oQcHS4+DHVUgJW/YyQ94jrP48MFQ0nMV 4IVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=24WPJd6LUHfqcAjq+Te6HIxWWT/PrZgIjG+eJWZflsI=; b=KrFzU1gBuehCy4GssqbociWt5MFMMyQv6m6/uzdthdBaRcb5kMoeiaciTmi6CQx0d0 KHgpOLlrSZ0A0JoqLPNjR4bPFgyL8PKKyAZbBYNI2YjGwgsKtGuGh7cGgxt0udZaNQ6e SPiuWPByBREsl7BO790mjhoZNtJ4yHYGPlxPksbQgsaQTv0Iiwk00SIZqamEuwRVWyUR j0Rk/5ll153d/6TZVwSU0AHVz65lfuR5hR8bYpTM+G6So7v5UU9KtK+Qr8gs9Q4meAOs MQrhMiEG4b/h0wXWCogklu902X1Tt2Y0ax5zBOp9XYFd5ZWgTN5EuKzJcEzxcSG0gS89 QB2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MKvoQxjw3hsHXtaJTZkWkWIh9A/QgtKIJhSRNyPxQDaJIZX4C jITrnEQJyrzS14yX4Usgza4LIm3RmgikqbeAvDWtWLP0sTM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxx/JQYFjOK6Co+0nuVFeQ6gO6rU2SdGWV9Dtm7BmMY4zr1FmR7hks/SW8IPWAtxWx893zZl3R3S6ni1CiaEQA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:a4c:b0:320:7e8a:60dc with SMTP id i12-20020a0561020a4c00b003207e8a60dcmr5255006vss.84.1648217874787; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 07:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <91b2da16-46e1-2370-d0f9-786934637c09@sunet.se>
In-Reply-To: <91b2da16-46e1-2370-d0f9-786934637c09@sunet.se>
From: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 07:17:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CANk3-ND6Hu5=fPskucoQKOCxAgwXBO9QuhQBoJBky8F5wOwemg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Cc: 113attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f07f3705db0ba01b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/xvOhNh3DBYRZtfUe3606BeocHqc>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:18:02 -0000
Hi Leif, Thanks for the comprehensive review. I had some good and bad experiences both, but in general think it worked "better than I was expecting it to". One question, in order to figure out what a concrete suggestion I could take away from your notes: > Maybe the IETF needs to rehink the purpouse of onsite meetings. > So in situations where most of the attendees can't attend in person due to global issues out of our control, are you suggesting we don't hold hybrid meetings? What do you think would be a good ratio of in-person to remote attendance that should be the barrier for deciding whether or not to hold an on-site meeting? [we've had remote participation for a long time of course, but the ratio was far lower] [note: I have no decision making ability in this area -- I'm just curious] -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both… Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Jan-Frederik Rieckers
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Göran Selander
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Henk Birkholz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joris Baum
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Antoine FRESSANCOURT
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Jen Linkova
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Mike Bishop
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … sburleig.sb
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Azael Fernandez Alcantara
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … John Levine
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ira McDonald
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Bob Hinden
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … David Waite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re: hyb… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Yoav Nir
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … NA-NiC
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Martin.Horneffer
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Yoav Nir
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Livingood, Jason
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Leif Johansson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Kyle Rose
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dan Romascanu
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Jay Daley
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Lars Eggert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Benoit Claise
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Tero Kivinen
- [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re: hyb… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Benson Muite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Douglass
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… David Waite
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Michael Richardson
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [113attendees] remote-inclusiveness (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of … Pete Resnick