Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds

[Tero Kivinen <[e-mail]>]

Yoav Nir writes:
> Avoiding that picture of a big room with three people sitting in the back is
> also a plus.

When you have two other security area working groups meeting at the
same time than yours, then there is less participation...

> As we learn how to make these hybrid meetings work, we may want to avoid
> having groups like that meet within IETF week. Virtual interims are still
> available. Perhaps it’s better to leave that slot available to groups that can
> make good use of it, like OAuth or TLS or LAMPS (to name just a few groups I
> know that could use more time).

I was considering to come to the i2nsf, but then decided to go to suit
instead. I would never consider joing to i2nsf virtual meeting, as
I am not that interested in i2nsf even when I have participated it
onsite few times before...

So the question is do you think this kind of random walkups are usuful
for the WG or not. I think they are useful and thats why I think
actual onsite meetings are better than virtual interims.
-- 
[e-mail]