IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 25 March 2022 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5323A0B88 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8uVsh-gSrvW6 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8459A3A0BD3 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (ipv6.dooku.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:6::1]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93BF51F4A6; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 21:14:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 596001A01DE; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 22:14:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Antoine FRESSANCOURT <antoine.fressancourt=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>, 113attendees <113attendees@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <132b08c49caa41e6a0be75c53841bb42@huawei.com>
References: <91b2da16-46e1-2370-d0f9-786934637c09@sunet.se> <132b08c49caa41e6a0be75c53841bb42@huawei.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Antoine FRESSANCOURT <antoine.fressancourt=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> message dated "Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:57:52 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 22:14:42 +0100
Message-ID: <14172.1648242882@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/6R2LW-pNTpj3AqJdbsf7-RNvzrs>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 21:14:52 -0000

Antoine FRESSANCOURT <antoine.fressancourt=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > - in many WG meetings, I had the impression to attend reporting that
    > could have been an email while actual technical discussions on items of
    > the WG were pushed to the mailing list for the sake of a lack of time.

    > The last point might be the one that puzzles me the most. What is the
    > point meeting in person to push discussions on online tools ?

This is an astute and intelligent question.
Many have been asking this question for ten years.
Maybe it's time to hire a professional of some kind to answer this question.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email